Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 3 (of 3), Land and peopleSkene, W. F. (William Forbes)
History
Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 3 (of 3), Land and people
Skene, W. F. (William Forbes)
Celts -- Scotland; Civilization, Celtic; Scotland -- Antiquities, Celtic; Scotland -- History -- To 1603
‘If the _Geilfiné_ and _Deirbhfiné_ both become extinct, three-fourths
of their _dibad_ shall go to the _Iarfiné_, and one-fourth to the
_Indfiné_.
‘If the _Indfiné_ and _Iarfiné_ both become extinct, three-fourths of
their _dibad_ shall go to the _Deirbhfiné_, and one-fourth to the
_Geilfiné_.
‘If the _Deirbhfiné_ and _Iarfiné_ have both become extinct,
three-fourths of their _dibad_ shall go to the _Geilfiné_, and
one-fourth to the _Indfiné_.
‘If the _Geilfiné_ and _Indfiné_ have both become extinct, three-fourths
of the _dibad_ of the _Geilfiné_ shall go to the _Deirbhfiné_, and
one-fourth of it to the _Iarfiné_; three-fourths of the _dibad_ of the
_Indfiné_ shall go to the _Iarfiné_, and one-fourth to the
_Deirbhfiné_.’
This seems to exhaust all possible combinations, and some provisions
follow which are not very easily understood; but when it is added, ‘And
the whole number of the seventeen men are then forthcoming, and if they
be not, there shall be no partition, but the nearest of kin shall take
it,’ the meaning seems to be that the group of seventeen persons must be
made up in each case, but if that cannot be done, there is no partition
of the _dibad_ to the person nearest in degree to the extinct family.
We are also told that ‘the _Geilfiné_ is the youngest and the _Indfiné_
the oldest,’ and that ‘if one person has come up into the _Geilfiné_ so
as to make it excessive, that is, more than five persons, a man must go
out of it up into the _Deirbhfiné_, and a man is to pass from one _Finé_
into the other up as far as the _Indfiné_, and a man is to pass from
that into the _Duthaig n-Daine_ or community.’[201]
It is exceedingly difficult to form anything like a clear conception of
the true nature of what appears to be so highly artificial an
arrangement, and it is probable that if it ever really existed in its
entirety, it must soon have broken down under the various modifications
which the natural progress of society brought to bear upon the
community. So far as we can gather, there seems undoubtedly to have been
the tie of kindred among themselves, and between them and the chief; and
a portion of the territory of the _Flath_ appears to have been assigned
to them under the name of _dibad_, the portion occupied by each group
being possessed in common by its members, so that it was only when the
subordinate groups became extinct that a redistribution of it took
place.
[Sidenote: Members of the four families.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account