Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 3 (of 3), Land and peopleSkene, W. F. (William Forbes)
History
Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 3 (of 3), Land and people
Skene, W. F. (William Forbes)
Celts -- Scotland; Civilization, Celtic; Scotland -- Antiquities, Celtic; Scotland -- History -- To 1603
While the clan, viewed as a single community, thus consisted of the
chief, with his kinsmen to a certain limited degree of relationship; the
commonalty who were of the same blood, who all bore the same name, and
his dependants, consisting of subordinate septs of native-men, who did
not claim to be of the blood of the chief, but were either probably
descended from the more ancient occupiers of the soil, or were broken
men from other clans, who had taken protection from him, the influence
of the acquisition of the right of property in land, which had
originally developed the septs out of the tribe, likewise tended to make
smaller septs within the clan. Those kinsmen of the chief who acquired
the property of their land founded families, in which the land became
hereditary, and which thus became the centres of a new organisation
within the clan. The most influential of these was that of the oldest
cadet in the family which had been longest separated from the main stem,
and usually presented the appearance of a rival house little less
powerful than that of the chief. There is perhaps no better description
of the form which the clan ultimately assumed, and of the spirit which
animated its members, than that given by an acute observer in the early
part of last century.[456] ‘The Highlanders,’ he says, ‘are divided into
tribes or clans, under chiefs or chieftains, as they are called in the
laws of Scotland; and each clan again divided into branches from the
main stock, who have chieftains over them. These are subdivided into
smaller branches of fifty or sixty men, who deduce their original from
their particular chieftains, and rely upon them as their more immediate
protectors and defenders. The ordinary Highlanders esteem it the most
sublime degree of virtue to love their chief and pay him a blind
obedience, although it be in opposition to the government, the laws of
the kingdom, or even to the law of God. Next to this love of their chief
is that of the particular branch from whence they sprang, and, in a
third degree, to those of the whole clan or name, whom they will assist,
right or wrong, against those of any other tribe with which they are at
variance. They likewise owe goodwill to such clans as they esteem to be
their particular well-wishers; and, lastly, they have an adherence one
to another as Highlanders in opposition to the people of the Low
Country, whom they despise as inferior to them in courage, and believe
they have a right to plunder them whenever it is in their power. This
last arises from a tradition that the Lowlands, in old times, were the
possession of their ancestors. The chief exercises an arbitrary
authority over his vassals, determines all differences and disputes that
happen among them, and levies taxes upon extraordinary occasions, such
as the marriage of a daughter, building a house, or some pretence for
his support and the honour of the name. This power of the chiefs is not
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account