Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 3 (of 3), Land and peopleSkene, W. F. (William Forbes)
History
Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 3 (of 3), Land and people
Skene, W. F. (William Forbes)
Celts -- Scotland; Civilization, Celtic; Scotland -- Antiquities, Celtic; Scotland -- History -- To 1603
This question we may at once answer in so far as regards the last
settlement in the series which we have extracted from that history. The
passing over of the sons of Erc into Alban twenty years after the battle
of Ocha is undoubtedly a true event. It was the foundation of the small
Scottish kingdom of Dalriada on the west coast north of the Firth of
Clyde by a colony of Scots, which took place in the year 498, and the
death of its first king, Fergus mor mac Erce, is recorded by Tighernac
in the year 501. The annals of this little kingdom may now be considered
as well ascertained. But can we attribute the same certainty to the
conquests supposed to have been made prior to the battle of Ocha? These
present several features calculated to lead us to a different
conclusion. On looking over the entire succession of those supposed
conquests and settlements in Alban, we can hardly fail to recognise the
same legends repeated at different times and cropping up in different
forms. Thus the supposed conquests of the race of Lughadh, son of Ith,
who were a different race from the Milesian Scots, and the settlement of
Fothadh Canann, from which sprang the Clann Mhic Cailin or Campbells,
seems merely a repetition of the much older settlement of the sons of
Neimhead in the districts of Dobhar and Iardobhar in Alban, who were
likewise a different race from the Milesian Scots, and from whom also
sprang the Clann Mhic Cailin or Campbells; and when the Fothadhs appear
not as of the race of Ith but as of the race of the Ui Eachach of
Ulster, that is, Irial Glunmhar, son of Conall Cearnach, who had two
sons, Forc and Iboth, they become Cruithnigh, and their settlement the
same as that of the two tribes Tuath Forc and Tuath Iboth; and this
again connects them with the supposed conquest by the mythic king
Rechtgidh Righdearg, who in another document appears as Fothadh
Righdearg. In the name Forc we can recognise the old name of the river
Forth, which again connects them with the district between the Tay and
the Forth, which appears to have been intended by the Dobhar and
Iardobhar; but this is the same district which was called by the Picts
Fortrenn, and to which, according to the Pictish legend, Cruithnechan,
the son of Lochit, son of Cinge, came with his Picts to help the Britons
of Fortrenn, and superseded them there; and this again corresponds with
the statement that the descendants of Braodn, son of Fergus Leithdearg,
who had occupied Dobhar and Iardobhar with his Nemedians, were driven
out by the Cruithnigh. And when we are told that Cruithnechan settled
his Picts in Magh Fortrenn and Maghghirghinn, we surely have the same
legend repeated in the supposed settlement of the sons of Corc, king of
Munster, when Cairpre Cruithnechan and Maine Leamhna settle in
Maghghirghinn and Maghleamhna. We can see that under these legends there
simply lies an attempt to express in these stories the popular
conception of the ethnic relations of local tribes. While in these tales
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account