Chambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 432: Volume 17, New Series, April 10, 1852Various
General
Chambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 432: Volume 17, New Series, April 10, 1852
Various
Periodicals
as the nearest land when the dust falls, because there are in it no
forms whatsoever exclusively native to Africa.' These were remarkable
facts, but warranted by the evidence: one, if not more, of the
animalcules was proved to be peculiar to America, and that country was
naturally inferred to be the quarter from which they had been derived.
The inquiry once begun was followed up; other specimens of dust were
submitted to the same critical test, and found generally to contain a
much greater number and variety of infusoria than the first--mostly
fresh-water forms, but with a few of marine origin; whence the
conclusion, that they had been brought from a coast-region; and
especially remarkable was the fact, that among all the forms there was
not one peculiar to the African continent. One example was known to
belong to the Isle of France, the others were chiefly South American.
After an examination of six specimens, obtained at different
intervals, Ehrenberg discovered that they contained four organisms in
common. 'I now consider myself,' he observes, 'justified in the
conclusion, that all the Atlantic dust may come only from one and the
same source, notwithstanding its extent and annual amount. The
constant yellow and reddish colour of the dust, produced by
ferruginous matter, its falling with the trade-winds and not with the
harmattan, increase the interest of the phenomena.'
It had always been supposed, that the dust which traversed the
Mediterranean was borne from the Great Sahara; but in a quantity
collected on board the ship _Revenge_, at Malta, an infusoria peculiar
to Chili was met with, which, with other characteristics, proved the
dust to be the same as that observed on the Atlantic. Their colour,
too, was identical; while the Sahara is a 'dazzling white sand:' hence
the dust brought across the Mediterranean by the sirocco was not
peculiar to Africa. The conclusion here arrived at was still further
verified by another sirocco-storm in May 1846, which extended to
Genoa, and bore with it a dust that 'covered the roofs of the city in
great abundance.' This, as was clearly ascertained, contained
formations identical with those which had been collected off the Cape
de Verd; and it was shewn that the dust-showers of the Atlantic, and
those of Malta and Genoa, were 'always of a yellow ochre-like
colour--not gray, like those of the kamsin, in North Africa.' The
peculiar colour of the dust was found to be caused by iron-oxide; and
from one-sixth to one-third of the whole proved to consist 'of
determinable organic parts.' In the following year, 1847, Ehrenberg
had another opportunity of testing his conclusions, in specimens of
dust which had fallen in Italy and Sicily in 1802 and 1813; the same
result came out on examination; 'several species peculiar to South
America, and none peculiar to Africa.'
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account