Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, Fifth Series, No. 2, Vol. I, January 12, 1884Various
History
Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, Fifth Series, No. 2, Vol. I, January 12, 1884
Various
Periodicals
At the time of the union of Ireland with Great Britain, confirmed by
the statute 39 and 40 Geo. III. (1801), it was provided in the Act of
Parliament that the peers of Ireland should have the power to elect
twenty-eight representatives from amongst their own body to sit in the
Upper House of the united legislatures for life. Such representative
peers are chosen when necessary, and when elected, _are_ lords of
parliament, and have all the privileges of peers of the United Kingdom.
Other Irish peers who are not representative peers are in a very
different position. They are not lords of parliament, although they
_primâ facie_ enjoy all such privileges as appertain to the peerage
generally. And this being so, an Irish peer, whether representative
or not, cannot be arrested for debt, in which respect he is on an
equality with all peers of the realm. An Irish peer may also be elected
as a member of the House of Commons for a constituency in England
or Scotland (by 39 and 40 Geo. III. c. 67); but by such election he
becomes for the time being a commoner, and so _pro tem._ loses the
privileges of a peer. It will be remembered that Lord Palmerston, who
represented Tiverton in the House of Commons for so many years, was a
peer of Ireland; and the present member of parliament for East Suffolk,
Lord Rendlesham, is also an Irish peer. His lordship, therefore, though
the peer of all other Irish peers—not representative peers—is not a
peer of, say, Lord Carlingford and other noblemen who sit in the House
of Lords as of right.[1] Indeed, Lord Rendlesham, so long as he sits in
the Lower House of parliament, is of necessity simply a commoner.
As to peers of Scotland only, they also are entitled to elect
representatives out of their general body to sit in the House of Lords.
The number so elected is sixteen; but, unlike the Irish representative
peers, they sit only during the existence of the parliament for which
they are elected. On the other hand, a Scotch peer of any grade, unlike
an Irish peer, is a peer of Great Britain, and he cannot, therefore,
sit in the House of Commons for any constituency whatever. The only
difference between a Scotch peer and a peer of the United Kingdom
is, that the former cannot as of right—that is, unless elected a
representative peer—sit in the House of Lords; in all other respects he
is the peer of a peer of the realm.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account