Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, Fifth Series, No. 4, Vol. I, January 26, 1884Various
History
Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, Fifth Series, No. 4, Vol. I, January 26, 1884
Various
Periodicals
It is clear from this extract that Spalding’s opinion was that which
the Marquis of Huntly adopted after consultation with his friends,
namely, that the fire was not accidental, but the result of a plot,
in which Frendraught and his lady were accomplices. This belief takes
forcible expression in the ballad which was composed on the occasion,
and is still popular in the neighbourhood of Frendraught. It is
sufficient to cite a few verses:
When steeds were saddled and well bridled,
And ready for to ride,
Then out came her and false Frendraught
Inviting them to bide.
. . . . .
When they were dressëd in their cloaths,
And ready for to boun,
The doors and windows was all secured,
The roof-tree burning down.
. . . . .
‘O mercy, mercy, Lady Frendraught!
Will ye not sink with sin?
For first your husband killed my father,
And now you burn his son.’
. . . . .
Oh, then outspoke her Lady Frendraught,
And loudly did she cry—
‘It were great pity for good Lord John,
But none for Rothiemay;
But the keys are casten in the deep draw-well;
Ye cannot get away.’
That the laird of Frendraught and his lady either contrived the deed or
acquiesced in it, is difficult of belief. The presumptions generally
are against such a conclusion. There is no reason for supposing that
the laird of Frendraught was not honest in reconciling himself to
Rothiemay; but even allowing him to be wicked enough to plan the
destruction by fire of the son of the man whom he had slain, while a
guest under his roof, how is it possible to believe that he chose a
plan which must involve the death of Viscount Melgum, a son of the
Marquis of Huntly, and hitherto his friend?
Crichton was perfectly aware of the popular suspicion; and the
fruitless visit of his wife to Gordon Castle sufficiently disclosed
the sentiments of the Marquis. Shortly after the fire, therefore, he
placed himself under the protection of the Lord Chancellor, offering
to undergo any trial, and to assist in every way in discovering the
perpetrators of the crime.
The Privy-council made the most strenuous efforts to pierce the
mystery. Before the end of the year, John Meldrum and three of his
servants, and about thirty of the servants or dependents of Crichton,
had been apprehended, and about as many more summoned to Edinburgh to
give evidence; but not the slightest clue was obtained as to the origin
of the fire.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account