Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, Fifth Series, No. 14, Vol. I, April 5, 1884Various
History
Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, Fifth Series, No. 14, Vol. I, April 5, 1884
Various
Periodicals
Again, if it be true, as Jevons says, that gold is one of the last
things to be regarded as wealth, and the labour expended in its
production almost a dead loss, and therefore a wrong to the human race,
the world should be very much poorer for all the enormous production
of the last half-century. On the contrary, the world has gone on
increasing in the appliances of wealth, in conditions of comfort, and
in diffusion of education.
The addition to the world’s stock of gold has permitted the creation
of an enormous amount of gold-certificates, as bank-notes and bills
of exchange may be regarded, the existence of which has facilitated
commercial operations which otherwise would not have been possible. In
theory, we exchange our coal and iron for the cotton, wheat, &c., of
other countries; but as we cannot mete out the exactly equal values
in ‘kind,’ we settle the difference nominally in gold, but actually
in paper representing gold. But the gold must nevertheless exist, or
the operation would be impossible. It is as when a man buys, let us
say, five hundred tons of pig-iron in Glasgow. He does not actually
receive into his hands five hundred tons of iron, but he receives a
warrant which entitles him to obtain such iron when and how he pleases.
Though the purchaser may never see the iron which he has bought, the
iron must be there, and producible at his demand. On the faith of the
transaction, he knows that he has command over five hundred tons of
iron; none of which may perhaps, save the ‘sample,’ have come under his
cognisance.
Of course there is no complete analogy between an iron warrant and a
paper currency, but it serves for the moment as a simple illustration.
To discuss the differences would lead us beyond the design of the
present paper.
Probably one great reason why gold so early in the history of the world
assumed its leading position as a standard of value is, that it is
found in a pure state. So also is silver, which is the nearest rival of
gold. Primitive races used these metals long before the art of smelting
was discovered. These two metals were both rare, both found pure, both
easily refined, both admitting of a splendid polish, both malleable
and ductile, both durable. Silver is more destructible than gold, less
durable, less rare, and even less useful in some respects. It has,
therefore, always had a lower value than gold.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account