Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, fifth series, no. 126, vol. III, May 29, 1886 — John Shaqi
Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, fifth series, no. 126, vol. III, May 29, 1886Various
History
Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, fifth series, no. 126, vol. III, May 29, 1886
Various
Periodicals
I write these pages as a warning. I don’t suppose any one will profit
by it. From the time of Cassandra downwards, nobody has ever paid
attention to warnings. But that is not my affair.
A London newspaper, some years ago, gave up several columns of its
valuable space to the question: ‘What shall we do with our Boys?’ I
perused the correspondence with a strong personal interest, for I
myself am the proprietor of a boy—several boys, in point of fact; but I
refer more particularly to my eldest, aged nineteen, as to whom I felt
that it was time something was settled. I have a great belief—partly
derived from the before-mentioned correspondence, and partly from my
own observation—in studying a boy’s natural bent, and finding him an
occupation in accordance with it. Such being the case, I began to
study Augustus with a view to finding out his special aptitude; but,
unless a really remarkable faculty of outgrowing his trousers may be so
regarded, I could not for some time discover that he had any. By dint,
however, of careful observation and cross-examination of the household,
I elicited that he was addicted to making extremely offensive smells
in the back kitchen with chemicals, and that he had what he called a
‘collection’ of beetles and other unpleasant insects stuck on pins in
a box in his bedroom. It appeared, therefore, that his proclivities
were scientific, and I ultimately decided to make an analyst of
him. Accordingly, after disposing of sundry painful but presumably
necessary arrangements as to premium, Augustus was duly articled to
a Public Analyst. I use capital letters, because I observed that Mr
Scrutin himself always did so. Why, I cannot say. Possibly, a public
analyst—without capitals—would not command the same amount of public
confidence. On consideration, I don’t suppose he would.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account