Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, fifth series, no. 128, vol. III, June 12, 1886 — John Shaqi
Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, fifth series, no. 128, vol. III, June 12, 1886Various
Science
Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, fifth series, no. 128, vol. III, June 12, 1886
Various
Periodicals
‘When I got the letter which has brought me here to-day, I felt its
appeal so strongly, that I made immediate arrangements to be present.
Tom has always been an exemplary boy in conduct, though I must say his
progress in the classics is deplorably slow. When I was his age, I read
Homer for the pleasure it gave me; and I had Horace by heart. Now,
a scholar Tom never will be; of that I have satisfied myself before
dinner in a private talk with him. Well, the ground is so far cleared.
Tom cannot be a scholar, _ergo_, he cannot be a clergyman; for of all
things inappropriate, in my opinion, the extreme is an ignorant divine.
In my profession, one ought to be steeped in Greek, permeated with
Latin, and saturated with Hebrew. But even if Tom were a born student
and of a serious order of mind, I could not advise his parents to
devote him to the Church.’
Something like a blank fell on Tom’s mother at the emphatic closure of
the reverend cousin’s speech. She had hoped that Tom might have gone
to Oxford, as other grammar-school boys had done, and thence to some
pretty rectory as a rural parson. While she sat in silent depression,
the rest of the company talked in little knots, until the reverend
president stopped them by saying: ‘Now, Uncle John, I call upon you.
No one is better able to say if the law promises fame and fortune for
the rising generation, as it has done for the past generations since
Cicero’s time. Shall we make Tom an attorney or a barrister?’
‘I am flattered by the manner you esteem my humble abilities,’ answered
Uncle John. ‘It is a strange coincidence of thought. I have also come
down from town expressly to deprecate the putting of our young hopeful
to _my_ profession. I believed I could lay my reasons before my brother
and his good wife better by a few spoken words, than by any extent of
correspondence; so I took an early train. Tom must not be a lawyer.
Why, I proceed as briefly as I can to explain. First, the profession
is more crowded than the market-place. Second, the crowd is daily
increasing, because almost every family of the middle classes that has
thriven during the past twenty or thirty years is sending a boy into
a solicitor’s office. The business is supposed to be very lucrative,
and it is esteemed highly respectable, which allures the _parvenu_
mind. As to the fiction of the law being a lucrative pursuit, I cannot
understand how it originated, still less how it is maintained. A few
solicitors, with quite exceptional luck and good connections, may
attain to opulence. But the rank and file of the profession merely earn
a decent livelihood. If you want to know what fortune does for lawyers
in England, read the reports of wills and bequests in the newspapers.
While these are telling us of manufacturing, banking, and trading
millionaires dying in all parts of the country, they rarely record the
demise of a lawyer worth twenty thousand pounds. No, no; the law is not
a money-making trade.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account