Chambers's Journal of popular literature, science, and art, fifth series, no. 133, vol. III, July 17, 1886Various
General
Chambers's Journal of popular literature, science, and art, fifth series, no. 133, vol. III, July 17, 1886
Various
Periodicals
[Illustration:
CHAMBERS’S JOURNAL
OF
POPULAR
LITERATURE, SCIENCE, AND ART
Fifth Series
ESTABLISHED BY WILLIAM AND ROBERT CHAMBERS, 1832
CONDUCTED BY R. CHAMBERS (SECUNDUS)
NO. 133.—VOL. III. SATURDAY, JULY 17, 1886. PRICE 1½_d._]
MODERN SLAVERY.
A WORD FOR OUR SHOP-ASSISTANTS.
That we, as a nation, are not lovers of change for the sake of change,
can hardly be disputed; indeed, our conservatism in minor matters may
justify the reflection cast upon us by our neighbours. But although
we may be willing to continue patronising forms and institutions that
may justly be considered antiquated and effete, yet it is nevertheless
a fact that once get the public ear, and the cry of the oppressed
will never be raised in vain, even though redress involves uprooting
of old-established customs. Opposition to sudden and violent changes
there may be; but the familiar instance of our factory laws shows that
there is help for the poorest and weakest, let the need for help once
be made known. But, unhappily, those who most need assistance are just
those least able to plead their own cause, either from ignorance or
from fear of the consequences of complaint. Such was the case with the
children, who needed an outsider’s voice to raise their ‘cry;’ and
with those women-labourers, the story of whose underground toils and
miseries needed but to be heard, to awake indignant protest against the
whole system which could produce such results. In the latter case, so
sweeping was the reform, that the recurrence of the evil is impossible;
and though the working of the Factory and Workshop Act may not be
altogether perfect, it affords a considerable measure of protection to
the helpless, and stands as a wholesome check between oppressor and
oppressed.
By the Factory Act, not only are factories proper placed under
government inspection, but all proprietors of workshops or workrooms
are liable to the salutary visit of the inspector, whose duty it is
to see that the terms of the Act are complied with; that is, that
the ‘hands’ work only a certain specified number of hours; and that
due regard is paid to ventilation and sanitary precautions. But the
inspector’s boundary is the workshop or workroom, and beyond this he
is powerless to interfere; although on his way to his department he
frequently passes by large numbers of those who need supervision and
protection fully as much as those on whose behalf his visit is paid,
yet who, as the law now stands, are utterly and hopelessly in the power
of employers, who are free if they will to work their victims to death
with impunity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account