Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, fifth series, no. 142, vol. III, September 18, 1886Various
History
Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, fifth series, no. 142, vol. III, September 18, 1886
Various
Periodicals
The previous will he had fair-copied with his own hand, instead of
handing it to his clerk or law-stationer. He did the same in this
case, though the document was longer and the transcription involved
considerable labour. His next proceeding, in the eyes of another
lawyer, would have seemed very curious, for lawyers are extremely
particular about the preservation, for future reference, of the draft
of any deed or other document which they prepare; but the draft of
this will Mr Blackford tore to fragments, which he afterwards burned
in the grate. He was taking unusual pains, in fact, to carry out the
testator’s wishes, that no one beside himself and his solicitor should
be aware of the contents of the will.
It was now past his usual lunch-time; and he strolled into the outer
office, and sent his boy to get him a dry biscuit and a glass of
brandy-and-water. Until this arrived, he stood chatting to Jobson on
indifferent subjects; and then intimating to him that he was going to
be extremely busy with private affairs, and must not be disturbed on
any account whatever, he retired with his spare meal. He locked the
door of his room behind him; he was about to enter on an important
part of his operation. He took up the old will—that which was to be
destroyed on the morrow—and examined it carefully as he ate and drank.
It was copied on a piece of the paper known as ‘demy;’ it occupied the
whole of the first page and four lines of the second. Then followed the
long and cumbrous attestation clause, with Mr Franklin’s straggling and
irregular signature against it. Taking a paper of the same size, shape,
and quality, the solicitor made an exact and laboured copy, or rather
fac-simile. It had the same number of lines, and each line contained
the same words as in the original. One or two unimportant erasures and
carelessly formed letters were faithfully repeated. The signature, ‘Wm.
Franklin,’ was transferred by means of tracing and carbonised paper,
and then gone over and touched up with the pen, until a most successful
imitation was produced. Two small blots, or rather splutters, had
been made by the testator in writing his name. Their positions were
accurately ascertained by measurement, their outlines transferred
with the tracing-paper and then filled in with ink; a final touch of
which Mr Blackford was reasonably proud, as indicating real genius.
The result was a duplicate, which only a very careful scrutiny could
have distinguished from the original of the will which was in his own
favour. This ended his labours for the present.
Next day, Mr Blackford presented himself and his two witnesses before
his client with the new will for signature. The old man, who was in
much the same condition, read it through for himself and expressed his
approval. The usual formalities were gone through, and the witnesses
dismissed.
‘Now,’ said Mr Franklin, ‘have you brought the other will?’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account