We then changed the conversation to the question of "whether Confucius
believed in God or not?" I had been instructed in this controversy by
one of the most learned missionaries in China, Dr. Ross of Mukden.
They maintained, as he told me they would maintain, that the Heaven of
Confucius meant Reason. {179} But Reason cannot possibly punish the
guilty, though the guilty might be punished by their want of Reason.
And as Confucius refers in several places to Heaven as a power that
punishes, the definition is obviously incorrect. It dates from a
philosopher called Chu. Again the learned men were absorbed in
controversy, every one enjoying such a discussion. The greatest number
still held to the doctrine that Heaven meant Reason, but a certain
number held that it meant a personal God. It ended in the controversy
becoming quite heated, and in a copy of Dr. Legge's translation of the
Chinese classics being fetched, so that I might fully understand their
different points of view. In the end we agreed that there was a
considerable force in the argument that Confucius believed in a
personal God.
When I further asked how Reason could possibly punish a bad man when he
was dead, and how it was that many a bad man, as we all know, died in
wealth and prosperity, they answered that after death his memory was
punished by his bad deeds coming to light. I suggested that if a man
was dead this did not matter to him, and that Confucius' assertion that
punishment followed sin implied a future life. When they were further
asked whether Confucius taught that all secret sin should one day be
made public, there was an eloquent silence, and we dropped the subject.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account