If in this way we are getting closer to China, we are still more
growing closer in thought. No longer can we speak of a gulf that
separates us from China. Every year English is becoming more and more
the language of educated men in {22} East; even though we cannot read
their books, they are reading ours either in translations or in the
original. Japan has set the example of having English taught
universally in her high schools, and now China is following her
example. A foreigner, talking about Esperanto, remarked: "What would
be the use of making an universal language? English, at any rate in
the East, is the universal language." That barbarous patois, "pidgin"
or business English, lives still in China. It consists of English
roots, enlarged by the addition of Portuguese words, put into Chinese
idiom and pronounced Chinese fashion. But "pidgin" English is fast
giving way to pure English, spoken most commonly with a marked American
accent.
If this growing proximity of China compels the attention of the
civilised world, the virgin wealth of her mineral resources and the
cheapness of her labour have excited the cupidity of the Western
capitalist, and it is daily more obvious that China must become the
centre of international politics, therefore the extent to which she
will affect the rest of the world should be a matter for careful
consideration. India, it will be urged, has long been in contact with
Europe, and the effect on Europe is small. Why should there be any
difference when another Oriental race comes in close proximity with
Europe? Putting on one side the fact that India has, both in trade and
in politics, had a very great effect on England, it can be answered
that there is an essential difference between the {23} brown
inhabitants of India and the yellow race. The former are, through
religion or custom, unable to accommodate themselves to the conditions
of Western civilisation; the latter have shown themselves such adepts
at accepting Western life that they have excelled the white man, to his
great annoyance, in his own civilisation. The Chinaman, who is
forbidden to enter America, Australia, and South Africa, is refused
admittance, not because he has been untried or because he has been
tried and found wanting, but because he has been tried in the three
continents and found by all who have tried him eminently efficient--so
efficient that if he were allowed to continue in those countries, he
would soon render the presence of the white settler unnecessary. He
has been tried in three just balances and been found of such value that
the white voter is unanimous in demanding his exclusion. But even the
most aggressive Chinese exclusionist can scarcely hope to exclude him
from his own country, and the Chinaman who stays at home is probably a
better man than the Chinaman who goes abroad.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account