Character of Renaissance ArchitectureMoore, Charles Herbert
History
Character of Renaissance Architecture
Moore, Charles Herbert
Architecture, Renaissance
It is not worth while to follow this phase of the French Renaissance
art much further, but Du Cerceau gives one other design that is worthy
of a moment’s attention for its freakish irrationality and, I will not
hesitate to say, ugliness, the project for the château of Charleval,
begun for Charles IX, but not far advanced in construction at the
time of his death, and never completed. The exterior façade of the
_basse-court_ is divided into a long series of bays (Fig. 125) by
colossal rusticated pilasters of two orders, embracing the two stories
into which the elevation, above the basement, is divided. Each pilaster
is crowned with a section of an architrave and frieze, in the form of a
ressaut of two orders, which interpenetrates the bed mouldings of the
continuous cornice. Since the architrave and frieze are not carried
along the intervening walls, the pilasters have no real entablature to
support even in appearance. Another unmeaning freak of design in this
façade is the kind of variation of the details of the several bays
which it exhibits. The rectangular windows are in one bay surmounted
with round archivolts, in the next with curved pediments, in another
with angular pediments above and curved ones below, in another with
curved pediments above and round archivolts below, in still another
with curved pediments above and a single one embracing both windows
below; and so on with continued change with no purpose but that of mere
change.[141] Viollet le Duc[142] commends the architect of this façade
for seeking what he calls a grand disposition without abandoning the
logical principles of his predecessors. But the great French master
appears to me to err in his reasoning here, as frequently elsewhere in
his discourse on the architecture of the Renaissance. The great order
of Doric pilasters used in this façade fills, he says, exactly the
function of buttresses, and he then proceeds to defend the whole scheme
by saying that, “Taking the order as a buttress it is possible, without
violence to reason, to cut it by a floor” (_i.e._ to divide the
space between the pilasters into two stories). But there is no sense
in taking the order as a buttressing system, for there is nothing in
the structure to require buttressing; and if there were, the pilasters
of an order, even though doubled, as in this case, would not form an
effective buttress system. It is in nothing but the general arrangement
of the main lines that such a composition can be said to bear any
resemblance to an organic mediæval system in which buttresses have a
function, and are shaped so as to express it.
[Illustration: FIG. 126.--Interior façade of Charleval,
Du Cerceau.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account