Character of Renaissance ArchitectureMoore, Charles Herbert
History
Character of Renaissance Architecture
Moore, Charles Herbert
Architecture, Renaissance
This remarkable scheme embodies the last notable attempt to solve
the great dome problem with which the architects of the Renaissance
had struggled from the time of Brunelleschi. But the problem is
incapable of a satisfactory solution. It is impossible to make a large
unbuttressed dome stand securely except by the extraneous means of
binding chains. Wren has not attempted to do such a thing. He was too
good an engineer to follow in the footsteps of Brunelleschi and Michael
Angelo. His dome is well buttressed, but it is therefore necessarily
hidden from view. To raise another dome of masonry from the cornice
of the drum for external effect, and to crown such a dome with a
stone lantern fifty feet high, he saw to be impossible with safety.
A semblance of such a dome was, however, necessary to his scheme. He
had been charged to make a dome “conspicuous above the houses,” and he
therefore surrounded the cone, the true support of the lantern, with a
wooden counterfeit of a dome upon which he makes the beholder believe
that the lantern rests. The system is thus a monstrous architectural
deceit. We have criticised Michael Angelo for springing a great dome
from the top of a drum, but he cannot be reproached for deception.
His dome is a real dome of masonry, and does carry the lantern as it
appears to, though, as we have seen, insecurely, except for so long
as the binding chains can be made to save it from collapse. Wren would
not build a dome in this inherently weak manner. He preferred to design
his masonry construction on sound principles, which would not allow
an external dome, and to enclose this within the wooden counterfeit.
And it may here be remarked that most modern domes, modelled after St.
Peter’s and St. Paul’s, are wooden constructions and carry lanterns of
wood. They are thus entirely safe, but they have not the monumental
character of great architectural works.
In general external effect the dome of St. Paul’s has much merit, if it
does not justify the extravagant remark of Mr. Loftie that it is the
“noblest dome in Christendom.”[177]
[Illustration: FIG. 137.--Vaulting of St. Paul’s.]
[Illustration:
Plate XII
INTERIOR OF ST. PAUL’S
London]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account