Charles Darwin and the Theory of Natural SelectionPoulton, Edward Bagnall, Sir
Science
Charles Darwin and the Theory of Natural Selection
Poulton, Edward Bagnall, Sir
Darwin, Charles, 1809-1882; Natural selection
“DEAR MR. MELDOLA,--It is very kind of you to offer to send me
the book, but I feel sure that it could not have belonged to
my grandfather.--My eldest brother’s name is Erasmus and he
attended to chemistry when young, and I suppose that the ‘Annals
of Philosophy’ was left at my Father’s house and sold with the
Library which belonged to my sisters.--I will look to the few
words of Preface to Wiesmann [_sic_], whenever I receive a
proof.--With many thanks.--
“Yours very faithfully,
“CH. DARWIN.”
Then followed a brief note dated “Aug. 8, 1881,” referring to some
point in the work upon which Meldola was then engaged, and which cannot
now be ascertained. Another letter of the same date referred to the
translation of Weismann, and contained some encouraging words upon the
interest created by the work and upon the success of the Essex Field
Club, in which Meldola had taken a leading part. Another brief note of
August 10th, 1881, apparently refers to some paper which cannot now be
identified.
The following interesting letter is of uncertain date:--
“_? 19th, ? 1881._
“Down.
“DEAR MR. MELDOLA,--When I read the F. M. [Fritz Müller] paper
your doubt occurred to me and I must say this, I would rather
have expected that the knowledge of distasteful caterpillars
would have been inherited, but I distinctly remember an account
(when Wallace first propounded his warning colors) published of
some birds, I think turkeys, being experimented upon and they
shook their heads after trying some caterpillars as if they had a
horrid taste in their mouths. I fancied this thing was published
by Mr. Weir or could it have been by Mr. Butler? It would be well
to look in Mr. Belt’s ‘Nicaragua’ as he tried some experiments. I
am not sure that there is not some statement of the kind in it.
“Yours faithfully,
“CHARLES DARWIN.
“I daresay Mr. Wallace or Bates would remember the statement of
some birds shaking their heads to which I refer.”
The statement about the turkeys evidently refers to Stainton’s
experiment with young birds of this kind, which immediately devoured
numerous protectively coloured moths, but, after seizing, invariably
rejected, a conspicuous white species (_Spilosoma menthastri_). It was
Belt’s ducks which shook their heads after tasting a very conspicuous
Nicaraguan frog. Darwin wished to show by this evidence that there was
no instinctive knowledge such as would have saved the birds from an
evidently unpleasant experience.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account