Charles Dickens: A critical studyChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Charles Dickens: A critical study
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
Dickens, Charles, 1812-1870
In reply to this question, “Why have we no great men to-day?” many
modern explanations are offered. Advertisement, cigarette-smoking, the
decay of religion, the decay of agriculture, too much humanitarianism,
too little humanitarianism, the fact that people are educated
insufficiently, the fact that they are educated at all, all these
are reasons given. If I give my own explanation, it is not for its
intrinsic value; it is because my answer to the question, “Why have
we no great men?” is a short way of stating the deepest and most
catastrophic difference between the age in which we live and the early
nineteenth century; the age under the shadow of the French Revolution,
the age in which Dickens was born.
The soundest of the Dickens critics, a man of genius, Mr. George
Gissing, opens his criticism by remarking that the world in which
Dickens grew up was a hard and cruel world. He notes its gross feeding,
its fierce sports, its fighting and foul humour, and all this he
summarizes in the words hard and cruel. It is curious how different are
the impressions of men. To me this old English world seems infinitely
less hard and cruel than the world described in Gissing’s own novels.
Coarse external customs are merely relative, and easily assimilated.
A man soon learnt to harden his hands and harden his head. Faced with
the world of Gissing, he can do little but harden his heart. But the
fundamental difference between the beginning of the nineteenth century
and the end of it is a difference simple but enormous. The first
period was full of evil things, but it was full of hope. The second
period, the _fin de siècle_, was even full (in some sense) of good
things. But it was occupied in asking what was the good of good things.
Joy itself became joyless; and the fighting of Cobbett was happier than
the feasting of Walter Pater. The men of Cobbett’s day were sturdy
enough to endure and inflict brutality; but they were also sturdy
enough to alter it. This “hard and cruel” age was, after all, the age
of reform. The gibbet stood up black above them; but it was black
against the dawn.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account