Charles Dickens: A critical studyChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Charles Dickens: A critical study
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
Dickens, Charles, 1812-1870
All this time, and indeed from a time of which no measure can be taken,
the creative part of his mind had been in a stir or even a fever. While
still a small boy he had written for his own amusement some sketches
of queer people he had met; notably, one of his uncle’s barber, whose
principal hobby was pointing out what Napoleon ought to have done
in the matter of military tactics. He had a note-book full of such
sketches. He had sketches not only of persons, but of places which
were to him almost more personal than persons. In the December of 1833
he published one of these fragments in the _Old Monthly Magazine_.
This was followed by nine others in the same paper, and when the paper
(which was a romantically Radical venture, run by a veteran soldier of
Bolivar) itself collapsed, Dickens continued the series in the _Evening
Chronicle_, an off-shoot of the morning paper of the same name. These
were the pieces afterwards published and known as the “Sketches by
Boz”; and with them Dickens enters literature. He also enters many
other things about this time; he enters manhood, and among other
things marriage. A friend of his on the _Chronicle_, George Hogarth,
had several daughters. With all of them Dickens appears to have been
on terms of great affection. This sketch is wholly literary, and I do
not feel it necessary to do more than touch upon such incidents as his
marriage, just as I shall do no more than touch upon the tragedy that
ultimately overtook it. But it may be suggested here that the final
misfortunes were in some degree due to the circumstances attending the
original action. A very young man fighting his way, and excessively
poor, with no memories for years past that were not monotonous
and mean, and with his strongest and most personal memories quite
ignominious and unendurable, was suddenly thrown into the society of a
whole family of girls. I think it does not overstate his weakness, and
I think it partly constitutes his excuse, to say that he fell in love
with all of them. As sometimes happens in the undeveloped youth, an
abstract femininity simply intoxicated him. And again, I think we shall
not be mistakenly accused of harshness if we put the point in this way;
that by a kind of accident he got hold of the wrong sister. In what
came afterwards he was enormously to blame. But I do not think that his
was a case of cold division from a woman whom he had once seriously
and singly loved. He had been bewildered in a burning haze, I will not
say even of first love, but of first flirtations. His wife’s sisters
stimulated him before he fell in love with his wife; and they continued
to stimulate him long after he had quarrelled with her for ever. This
view is strikingly supported by all the details of his attitude towards
all the other members of the sacred house of Hogarth. One of the
sisters remained, of course, his dearest friend till death. Another who
had died, he worshipped as a saint, and he always asked to be buried
in her grave.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account