Charles Dickens: A critical studyChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Charles Dickens: A critical study
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
Dickens, Charles, 1812-1870
The idea of Tupman, the fat lady-killer, is in itself
quite dreary and vulgar; it is the detailed Tupman, as he is developed,
who is unexpectedly amusing. The idea of Winkle, the clumsy sportsman,
is in itself quite stale; it is as he goes on repeating himself that
he becomes original. We hear of men whose imagination can touch with
magic the dull facts of our life, but Dickens’s yet more indomitable
fancy could touch with magic even our dull fiction. Before we are
halfway through the book the stock characters of dead and damned farces
astonish us like splendid strangers.
Seymour’s claim, then, viewed symbolically was even a compliment. It
was true in spirit that Dickens obtained (or might have obtained) the
start of Pickwick from somebody else, from anybody else. For he had
a more gigantic energy than the energy of the intense artist, the
energy which is prepared to write something. He had the energy which
is prepared to write anything. He could have finished any man’s tale.
He could have breathed a mad life into any man’s characters. If it
had been true that Seymour had planned out Pickwick, if Seymour had
fixed the chapters and named and numbered the characters, his slave
would have shown even in these shackles such a freedom as would have
shaken the world. If Dickens had been forced to make his incidents out
of a chapter in a child’s reading-book, or the names in a scrap of
newspaper, he would have turned them in ten pages into creatures of
his own. Seymour, as I say, was in a manner right in spirit. Dickens
would at this time get his materials from anywhere, in the sense that
he cared little what materials they were. He would not have stolen;
but if he had stolen he would never have imitated. The power which
he proceeded at once to exhibit was the one power in letters which
literally cannot be imitated, the primary inexhaustible creative
energy, the enormous prodigality of genius which no one but another
genius could parody. To claim to have originated an idea of Dickens is
like claiming to have contributed a glass of water to Niagara. Wherever
this stream or that stream started the colossal cataract of absurdity
went roaring night and day. The volume of his invention overwhelmed all
doubt of his inventiveness; Dickens was evidently a great man; unless
he was a thousand men.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account