Charles Dickens: A critical studyChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Charles Dickens: A critical study
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
Dickens, Charles, 1812-1870
The spirit of the early century produced great men, because it believed
that men were great. It made strong men by encouraging weak men.
Its education, its public habits, its rhetoric, were all addressed
towards encouraging the greatness in everybody. And by encouraging the
greatness in everybody, it naturally encouraged superlative greatness
in some. Superiority came out of the high rapture of equality. It is
precisely in this sort of passionate unconsciousness and bewildering
community of thought that men do become more than themselves. No man
by taking thought can add one cubit to his stature; but a man may add
many cubits to his stature by not taking thought. The best men of the
Revolution were simply common men at their best. This is why our age
can never understand Napoleon. Because he was something great and
triumphant, we suppose that he must have been something extraordinary,
something inhuman. Some say he was the Devil; some say he was the
Superhuman. Was he a very, very bad man? Was he a good man with some
greater moral code? We strive in vain to invent the mysteries behind
that immortal mask of brass. The modern world with all its subtleness
will never guess his strange secret; for his strange secret was that he
was very like other people.
And almost without exception all the great men have come out of this
atmosphere of equality. Great men may make despotisms; but democracies
make great men. The other main factory of heroes besides a revolution
is a religion. And a religion again, is a thing which, by its nature,
does not think of men as more or less valuable, but of men as all
intensely and painfully valuable, a democracy of eternal danger. For
religion all men are equal, as all pennies are equal, because the only
value in any of them is that they bear the image of the King. This
fact has been quite insufficiently observed in the study of religious
heroes. Piety produces intellectual greatness precisely because
piety in itself is quite indifferent to intellectual greatness. The
strength of Cromwell was that he cared for religion. But the strength
of religion was that it did not care for Cromwell; did not care for
him, that is, any more than for anybody else. He and his footman were
equally welcomed to warm places in the hospitality of hell. It has
often been said, very truly, that religion is the thing that makes the
ordinary man feel extraordinary; it is an equally important truth that
religion is the thing that makes the extraordinary man feel ordinary.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account