Charles Dickens: A critical studyChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Charles Dickens: A critical study
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
Dickens, Charles, 1812-1870
In the July of 1844 Dickens went on an Italian tour, which he
afterwards summarized in the book called “Pictures from Italy.” They
are, of course, very vivacious, but there is no great need to insist
on them, considered as Italian sketches; there is no need whatever to
worry about them as a phase of the mind of Dickens when he travelled
out of England. He never travelled out of England. There is no trace
in all these amusing pages that he really felt the great foreign
things which lie in wait for us in the south of Europe, the Latin
civilization, the Catholic Church, the art of the centre, the endless
end of Rome. His travels are not travels in Italy, but travels in
Dickensland. He sees amusing things; he describes them amusingly. But
he would have seen things just as good in a street in Pimlico, and
described them just as well. Few things were racier even in his raciest
novel, than his description of the marionette play of the death of
Napoleon. Nothing could be more perfect than the figure of the doctor,
which had something wrong with its wires, and hence “hovered about
the couch and delivered medical opinions in the air.” Nothing could
be better as a catching of the spirit of all popular drama than the
colossal depravity of the wooden image of “Sir Udson Low.” But there
is nothing Italian about it. Dickens would have made just as good fun,
indeed just the same fun, of a Punch and Judy show performing in Long
Acre or Lincoln’s Inn Fields.
Dickens uttered just and sincere satire on Plornish and Podsnap;
but Dickens was as English as any Podsnap or any Plornish. He had a
hearty humanitarianism, and a hearty sense of justice to all nations,
so far as he understood it. But that very kind of humanitarianism,
that very kind of justice, were English. He was the Englishman of the
type that made Free Trade, the most English of all things, since it
was at once calculating and optimistic. He respected catacombs and
gondolas, but that very respect was English. He wondered at brigands
and volcanoes, but that very wonder was English. The very conception
that Italy consists of these things was an English conception. The root
things he never understood, the Roman legend, the ancient life of the
Mediterranean, the world-old civilization of the vine and olive, the
mystery of the immutable Church. He never understood these things,
and I am glad he never understood them: he could only have understood
them by ceasing to be the inspired cockney that he was, the rousing
English Radical of the great Radical age in England. That spirit of
his was one of the things that we have had which were truly national.
All other forces we have borrowed, especially those which flatter us
most. Imperialism is foreign, socialism is foreign, militarism is
foreign, education is foreign, strictly even Liberalism is foreign. But
Radicalism was our own; as English as the hedge-rows.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account