Charles Dickens: A critical studyChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Charles Dickens: A critical study
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
Dickens, Charles, 1812-1870
This Christmas tone of Dickens, in connection with his travels is a
matter that can only be expressed by a parallel with one of his other
works. Much the same that has here been said of his “Pictures from
Italy” may be said about his “Child’s History of England;” with the
difference that while the “Pictures from Italy,” do in a sense add to
his fame, the “History of England” in almost every sense detracts from
it. But the nature of the limitation is the same. What Dickens was
travelling in distant lands, that he was travelling in distant ages;
a sturdy, sentimental English Radical with a large heart and a narrow
mind. He could not help falling into that besetting sin or weakness
of the modern progressive, the habit of regarding the contemporary
questions as the eternal questions and the latest word as the last.
He could not get out of his head the instinctive conception that the
real problem before St. Dunstan was whether he should support Lord John
Russell or Sir Robert Peel. He could not help seeing the remotest peaks
lit up by the raging bonfire of his own passionate political crisis. He
lived for the instant and its urgency; that is, he did what St. Dunstan
did. He lived in an eternal present like all simple men. It is indeed
“A Child’s History of England;” but the child is the writer and not the
reader.
But Dickens in his cheapest cockney utilitarianism, was not only
English, but unconsciously historic. Upon him descended the real
tradition of “Merry England,” and not upon the pallid mediævalists who
thought they were reviving it. The Pre-Raphaelites, the Gothicists,
the admirers of the Middle Ages, had in their subtlety and sadness the
spirit of the present day. Dickens had in his buffoonery and bravery
the spirit of the Middle Ages. He was much more mediæval in his attacks
on mediævalism than they were in their defences of it. It was he who
had the things of Chaucer, the love of large jokes and long stories and
brown ale and all the white roads of England. Like Chaucer he loved
story within story, every man telling a tale. Like Chaucer he saw
something openly comic in men’s motley trades. Sam Weller would have
been a great gain to the Canterbury Pilgrimage and told an admirable
story. Rossetti’s Damozel would have been a great bore, regarded as
too fast by the Prioress and too priggish by the Wife of Bath. It is
said that in the somewhat sickly Victorian revival of feudalism which
was called “Young England,” a nobleman hired a hermit to live in his
grounds. It is also said that the hermit struck for more beer. Whether
this anecdote be true or not, it is always told as showing a collapse
from the ideal of the Middle Ages to the level of the present day. But
in the mere act of striking for beer the holy man was very much more
“mediæval” than the fool who employed him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account