Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 03 (of 20)Sumner, Charles
History
Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 03 (of 20)
Sumner, Charles
Slavery -- United States; Speeches, addresses, etc., American
"The lord's remedy for a _fugitive villein_ was either by seizure
or by suing out a writ of _Nativo Habendo_, or Neifty, as it is
sometimes called. If the lord seized, the villein's most effectual
mode of recovering liberty was by the writ of _Homine Replegiando_,
which had great advantage over the writ of _Habeas Corpus_. In
the _Habeas Corpus_ the return cannot be contested by pleading
against the truth of it, and consequently on a _Habeas Corpus the
question of liberty cannot go to a jury for trial_.... But in the
_Homine Replegiando_ it was otherwise.... The plaintiff, ... on the
defendant's pleading the villenage, had the same opportunity of
contesting it as when impleaded by the lord in a _Nativo Habendo_.
If the lord sued out a _Nativo Habendo_, and the villenage was
denied, in which case the sheriff could not seize the villein, _the
lord was then to enter his plaint in the county court_; and as the
sheriff was not allowed to try the question of villenage in his
court, the lord could not have any benefit from the writ, without
removing the cause by the writ of _Pone_ into the King's Bench or
Common Pleas."[177]
[176] Argument in Sommersett's Case: Howell's State Trials, XX. 42.
[177] Ibid., 38, 39, note.
The authority of Mr. Hargrave is sufficient. But I mean to place this
matter beyond all cavil. From the Digest of Lord Chief Baron Comyns,
which at the adoption of the Constitution was among the classics of
our jurisprudence, I derive another description of the remedy.
"If the lord claims an inheritance in his villein, _who flies from
his lord against his will_, and lives in a place out of the manor
to which he is regardant, the lord shall have a _Nativo Habendo_.
And upon such writ, directed to the sheriff, he may seize him who
does not deny himself to be a villein. But if the defendant say
that he is a freeman, the sheriff cannot seize him, but the lord
must remove the writ by _Pone_ before the Justices in Eyre, or in
C.B., _where he must count upon it_."[178]
An early writer of peculiar authority, Fitzherbert, in his _Natura
Brevium_, on the writs of the Common Law, thus describes these
proceedings.
[178] Comyns's Digest: Remedy for a Villein, (C. 1,) _Nativo
Habendo_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account