Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 05 (of 20)Sumner, Charles
History
Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 05 (of 20)
Sumner, Charles
Slavery -- United States; Speeches, addresses, etc., American
On the morning of January 28, 1857, the country was startled by the
telegraphic news that Mr. Brooks had died suddenly on the evening
before, in great pain, at his hotel in Washington. The terms of this
despatch belong to this note.
“The Hon. Preston S. Brooks died this evening at Brown’s Hotel.
He had been in bed for a day or two, suffering from the effects
of a severe cold. He was telling his friends that he had passed
the crisis of his illness, and felt considerably improved in
health, when he was seized with violent croup, and died in
about ten minutes afterwards. He expired in intense pain.
The event, so sudden, has caused much surprise and sympathy
throughout the city.
“Dr. Boyle, who was called to dress the wounds of Mr. Sumner,
was his physician. Considerable excitement was produced by
this visitation of Providence. His personal friends seem
smitten, while the mass of those who crowd the hotels come to
the general conclusion that the wrath of man is avenged in the
justice of God. There are numerous knots of people in each of
the hotels, talking about the death of Brooks. He died a horrid
death, and suffered intensely. He endeavored to tear his own
throat open to get breath.”
Later advices revealed that Mr. Keitt, with others, was by his bedside.
His death was announced to the House of Representatives, January 29th,
when his funeral took place in the House.
Senator Butler died at home, in South Carolina, May 25, 1857. Mr.
Keitt, after an active and vindictive part in the Rebellion, died in
battle in Virginia, in June, 1864.
II.
ADOPTION OF THE ASSAULT BY EMINENT SLAVE-MASTERS, AND BY THE SOUTH
GENERALLY.
More significant even than the assault was the evidence, which soon
accumulated, showing its adoption at the South. Had it been disapproved
there, it would have stood as the act of an individual. Had it been
received even in silence, without formal disapprobation, there would
have been at least a question with regard to the sentiment there, and
charity would have supplied the most extenuating interpretation. But
the spirit of Slavery was too strong, making haste to speak out by its
representatives of every degree. It began at once.
On the publication of Mr. Sumner’s testimony, there were some
explanations in the Senate.[145] Hon. John Slidell, of Louisiana,
described himself as in conversation with several gentlemen, in the
anteroom of the Senate, when he first heard of the assault.
“We had been there some minutes,--I think we were alone in the
antechamber,--when a person (if I recollect aright, it was
Mr. Jones, a messenger of the Senate) rushed in, apparently
in great trepidation, and said that somebody was beating Mr.
Sumner. We heard this remark without any particular emotion;
for my own part, I confess I felt none.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account