Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 11 (of 20)Sumner, Charles
History
Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 11 (of 20)
Sumner, Charles
Slavery -- United States; Speeches, addresses, etc., American
March 30th, the Senate having under consideration a bill, that
had already passed the House of Representatives, to provide
a temporary government for the Territory of Montana, Mr.
Wilkinson, of Minnesota, moved to amend the clause relating
to persons entitled to vote and eligible to office, so that,
instead of “every _white male inhabitant_,” it should read
“every _free male citizen_ of the United States, and those who
have declared their intention to become such.” Mr. Reverdy
Johnson at once declared that “the effect of the amendment was
to admit to the elective franchise in the proposed Territory
black men as well as white,” and, after mentioning the number
of Africans now in the United States, he proceeded to say
that “it can hardly be seriously contended, that, of that
four millions, such portion of them as have been in a state
of slavery from infancy to the present time are intelligent
enough, or likely to become intelligent enough, at once to
exercise the right of suffrage”; and he anticipated another
question, “just as likely to excite the public as the question
of the existence of Slavery in itself.”
March 31st, the amendment was adopted,--Yeas 22, Nays 17. The
debate continuing, Mr. Johnson said that the term “citizen”
was not applicable to “black men,” “because the Supreme
Court of the United States has decided, and that question
was directly before the Court in the Dred Scott case, that
a person of African descent is not a citizen of the United
States.” Mr. Wilkinson was willing it should stand according
to his amendment, and let the decision of the Supreme Court be
whatever it might. He wanted neither “white” nor “black” put
into the bill. Mr. Sumner then remarked:--
“I take it that each branch of the Government can interpret
the Constitution for itself. I think that Congress is as
good an authority in its interpretation as the Supreme
Court, and I hope that in legislation it will proceed
absolutely without respect to a decision which has
disgraced the country, and ought to be expelled from its
jurisprudence.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account