Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 12 (of 20) — John Shaqi
Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 12 (of 20)Sumner, Charles
History
Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 12 (of 20)
Sumner, Charles
Slavery -- United States; Speeches, addresses, etc., American
“We ask attention to his view of the precedents, therefore,
and to the connection which he establishes between them
and the present case, as being both interesting and
instructive, and as deserving no small weight in settling
our views upon this important subject. He makes it clear,
that, whatever Brazil may feel herself called upon to say
in the matter, it does not lie in the mouth of England,
either by her press or her ministry, to intermeddle by
lecturing the United States.… The most embarrassing feature
in the Florida case, however, has been removed within a few
hours by the fortuitous collision of an army transport with
this steamer, in the crowded roadstead at Fortress Monroe.”
Admiral Porter’s despatch reports this incident.
“FORTRESS MONROE, November 28, 1864.
“HON. GIDEON WELLES, _Secretary of the Navy_:--
“I have just received a telegram from the commander of
the prize steamer Florida, informing me that she had
sunk in nine fathoms of water. She had been run into by
an army steamer, and badly damaged. I have not heard the
particulars. I will inform the Department, when I receive
the written report.
“DAVID D. PORTER, _Rear-Admiral_.”
If we may judge from recent English newspapers, there is to be another
cry against us, on account of the Florida, not unlike that on account
of the Trent. One paper says the seizure was “most flagrantly
lawless”; another, that “the precedent will establish a claim to
the right to pursue and destroy every such vessel, whatever may be
the port in which she may seek shelter or supplies”; another, that
“the outrage cannot be permitted to pass unnoticed by other powers”;
and still another, that “events such as these will speedily force
European nations to interfere in the American difficulty for their own
security.” Such are specimens of British criticism, before the facts in
the case have been ascertained in any authentic form, and before our
Government has had opportunity to declare itself on the subject.
The same swiftness occurred in the matter of the Trent. The parallel
will be complete, if Earl Russell sends us a letter of complaint.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account