Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 13 (of 20)Sumner, Charles
History
Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 13 (of 20)
Sumner, Charles
Slavery -- United States; Speeches, addresses, etc., American
“All men of common sense must now see that there can now be
no loyal civil governments in these States, if the negroes
are not permitted to neutralize with their votes the votes of
Rebels. On this account I do hope the joint resolution recently
introduced in the Senate by Mr. Sumner will prevail. Whatever
may have been our former notions in regard to the negro, it is
now very evident that practically they are better citizens than
the majority of whites, in some portion of the Rebel States.
The Declaration of Independence is the true and just basis upon
which these State governments must be founded.”
Such is the voice of a Unionist of Alabama. He looks to Congress. God
forbid that Congress should abdicate its beneficent powers! They are
all needed for the safety and welfare of the Republic. I cannot, I dare
not, help in any such abdication.
The history of the debate and its result appear in the Appendix
to the Speech of February 5th and 6th.[271]
NO MORE STATES WITH THE WORD “WHITE” IN THE STATE CONSTITUTION.
SPEECHES IN THE SENATE, ON THE BILL FOR THE ADMISSION OF THE STATE OF
COLORADO INTO THE UNION, MARCH 12 AND 13, APRIL 17, 19, AND 24, AND MAY
21, 1866.
March 12th, in the Senate, the bill for the admission of the
State of Colorado was taken up for consideration, when Mr.
Sumner commenced an opposition, in which he persevered. The
question was, in his judgment, of peculiar importance, as
involving the true principle of Reconstruction; so that, while
insisting upon equal rights in Colorado, he was contributing to
the same cause.
In a speech of some length he set forth “three distinct
objections at this moment to the admission of Colorado as
a State,” which he considered in their order: first, the
irregularity of the proceedings, ending in the seeming adoption
of the Constitution; secondly, the smallness of the population;
and, thirdly, that its Constitution was not republican in form,
and consistent with the Declaration of Independence, according
to the requirement of the Enabling Act. In the course of his
remarks on the two latter heads, he said:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account