Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 13 (of 20)Sumner, Charles
History
Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 13 (of 20)
Sumner, Charles
Slavery -- United States; Speeches, addresses, etc., American
more numerous,--at least until entitled to one Representative in the
other House. At the proper time we shall gladly welcome them; but the
time has not come.
* * * * *
There is another objection, which stands forth on the face of their
constitution. It is not republican in form, or in harmony with the
Declaration of Independence. The requirement of the Enabling Act, under
which they pretend to proceed, but which, as I have shown, was already
exhausted before they entered upon these proceedings, has these words:--
“That the Constitution, when formed, shall be republican, and
not repugnant to the Constitution of the United States and the
principles of the Declaration of Independence.”[272]
Look now at this Constitution. Article III., entitled “Suffrage and
Elections,” begins as follows:--
“SECTION 1. Every _white male citizen_ of the age of
twenty-one years and upwards, who is by birth, or has become
by naturalization or by treaty, or shall have declared his
intention to become, a citizen of the United States according
to the laws thereof, and who shall have resided in the State
of Colorado for six months preceding any election, and shall
have been a resident for ten days of the precinct or election
district where he offers to vote, shall be deemed a qualified
elector, and entitled to vote at the same.”
Note well the text, “every white male citizen”: in other words, nobody
who is not “white,” under this constitution, is recognized as entitled
to the elective franchise. Now, Sir, I insist--and I here challenge
reply from any Senator on this floor--that such a constitution does
not comply with the requirement of the Enabling Act, that it is
not republican, and that it is repugnant to the principles of the
Declaration of Independence. I say that it is not republican; for the
first principle of republican government is equality. Let that be
denied, and you fail in republican government.
MR. MCDOUGALL [of California]. In what age of the world was
there a republic where there was equality? Please answer me
that.… I would like to have the single instance where it
existed in ancient times, in the middle ages, or in the modern
ages.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account