Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 13 (of 20)Sumner, Charles
History
Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 13 (of 20)
Sumner, Charles
Slavery -- United States; Speeches, addresses, etc., American
“It will be remembered that this bill was introduced on the
first day of the last session,--that it was the subject of
repeated debate in this Chamber,--that it was more than
once referred to the Committee on the District of Columbia,
by whose chairman it was reported back to the Senate. At
several different stages it was supposed that we were about
to reach a final vote. The country expected that vote. It
was not had. It ought to have been had. And now, Sir, I
think it best for the Senate, in this very first hour of
its coming together, to put that bill on its passage. It
has been thoroughly debated. Every Senator has made up his
mind. There is nothing more to be said on either side. So
far as I am concerned, I am perfectly willing that the vote
shall be taken without one further word; but I think that
the Senate ought not to allow the bill to be postponed. We
should seize this first occasion to put the bill on its
passage. The country expects it; the country will rejoice
and be grateful, if you will signalize this first day of
your coming together by this beautiful and generous act.”
The Chair, after recognizing the motion, ruled it not in order,
according to a former precedent.
* * * * *
December 10th, on motion of Mr. Morrill, the Senate proceeded
with the Suffrage Bill. Mr. Sumner joined in urging it:--
“Let us, so far as the Senate can do it, give suffrage to
the colored race in the District; let us signalize this
first day of actual business by finishing this great act.”
Debate ensued for four days, in which Mr. Morrill, Mr. Willey,
of West Virginia, Mr. Wilson, of Massachusetts, Mr. Pomeroy, of
Kansas, Mr. Anthony, of Rhode Island, Mr. Williams, of Oregon,
Mr. Cowan, of Pennsylvania, Mr. Wade, of Ohio, Mr. Yates, of
Illinois, Mr. Reverdy Johnson, of Maryland, Mr. Gratz Brown, of
Missouri, Mr. Davis, of Kentucky, Mr. Sprague, of Rhode Island,
Mr. Buckalew, of Pennsylvania, Mr. Doolittle, of Wisconsin,
Mr. Dixon, of Connecticut, Mr. Saulsbury, of Delaware, Mr.
Foster, of Connecticut, Mr. Frelinghuysen, of New Jersey, Mr.
Hendricks, of Indiana, Mr. Lane, of Indiana, and Mr. Sumner,
took part. The remarks of the last will appear in their proper
place, according to date.[2] Among the amendments considered
was one by Mr. Cowan to strike out the word “male,” so as to
open suffrage to women, which was rejected,--Yeas 9, Nays
37. The amendment by Mr. Dixon, making reading and writing a
qualification, was also rejected,--Yeas 11, Nays 34.
December 13th, the bill passed the Senate,--Yeas 32, Nays
13. The announcement of its passage was followed by applause
in the galleries. On the next day the bill passed the other
House,--Yeas 128, Nays 46.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account