Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 14 (of 20)Sumner, Charles
History
Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 14 (of 20)
Sumner, Charles
Slavery -- United States; Speeches, addresses, etc., American
I have no doubt that the motion to correct the journal would be in
order even at a late day. I believe that at any day any Senator might
rise in his place and move to expunge from the journal a record in
itself derogatory to the body. I have in my hands a reference to
the case of John Wilkes, who, you will remember, just before our
Revolution, was excluded from Parliament, while his competitor,
Luttrell, was declared duly elected. The decision of Parliament, so the
history records, convulsed the whole kingdom for thirteen years, but
after that long period it was expunged from the journal,--I now quote
the emphatic words,--“as being subversive of the rights of the whole
body of electors of this kingdom.” I submit, Sir, the record in your
journal is subversive of the great principle of jurisprudence on which
the rights of every citizen depend.
Mr. Reverdy Johnson followed, criticizing Mr. Sumner. He
concluded by saying: “Even supposing there was the slightest
want of delicacy in casting a vote upon such a question by
the member whose seat is contested, it was in the particular
instance more than justified by the circumstances existing at
the time the vote was cast.”
Mr. Trumbull said:--
“I believe, as I said before, that the Senator from New
Jersey is entitled to his seat; but I do not believe that
he is entitled to hold his seat by his own vote. He would
have held his seat without his own vote. The vote upon
the resolution was a tie without the vote of the Senator
from New Jersey; and that would have left him in his seat,
he already having been sworn in as a member. It is not
necessary that the resolution should have passed. He is
here as a Senator, and it would require an affirmative vote
to deprive him of his seat as a Senator.”
He then avowed his willingness to move a reconsideration of the
vote by which the resolution was carried, “if that is necessary
to accomplish the object.”
Mr. Sumner, after saying, that, when he brought forward his
motion, he had no reason to suppose that any Senator would move
a reconsideration, proceeded:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account