Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 19 (of 20)Sumner, Charles
History
Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 19 (of 20)
Sumner, Charles
Slavery -- United States; Speeches, addresses, etc., American
“Nor have they been the work of Spanish emigrants who have
penetrated the territory of San Domingo; nor has the superior
authority of Havana, nor the forces of sea and land at its
disposition, contributed to them. The Captain-General of Cuba
has not separated himself, nor could he depart for a moment,
from the principles of the Government, and from the policy
which it has followed with regard to them. _Not a Spanish
bottom or soldier was on the coast or in the territory of the
Republic_ when the latter by a unanimous movement proclaimed
its reunion to Spain.”[12]
It will be observed with what energy of phrase the Spanish Minister
excludes all suspicion of force on the part of Spain. Not only was
there no Spanish ship on the coast, but not a single Spanish bottom.
And then it is alleged that “the first condition” of reannexion must
be “the unanimous, spontaneous, and explicit expression of the will of
the Dominicans.” No foreign influence, no Spanish influence, was to
interfere with the popular will. But this is nothing more than justice.
Anything else is wrong.
The Spanish Government, not content with announcing this important rule
in the dispatch which I have quoted, return to it in another similar
dispatch, dated at Madrid, 26th May, 1861, as follows:--
“The Government of the Queen, before adopting a definitive
resolution on this question, sought to acquire absolute
assurance that the votes of the Dominican people had been
spontaneous, free, and unanimous. The reception of the
proclamation of the Queen as sovereign in all the villages of
the territory of San Domingo proves _the spontaneousness and
the unanimity of the movement_.”[13]
Here again is the allegation that the movement was spontaneous and
unanimous, and that the Spanish Government sought to acquire absolute
assurance on this essential point. This was openly recognized as the
condition-precedent; and I cite it as unanswerable testimony to what
was deemed essential.
On this absolute assurance the Ministers laid before the Queen in
Council a decree of reannexion, with an explanatory paper, under date
of 19th May, 1861, where the unanimity of the Dominican people is again
asserted, and also the absence of any influence on the part of Spain:--
“Everywhere was manifested jubilee and enthusiasm in a manner
unequivocal and solemn. The public authorities, following
their own impulses, have obeyed the sentiment of the country,
which has put its trust in them. Rarely has been seen such a
concurrence, such a unanimity of wills to realize an idea, a
common thought. _And all this, without having on the coast of
San Domingo a single bottom, nor on the territory a soldier of
Spain._”[14]
Such is the official record on which the decree of reannexion was
adopted. Mark well, Sir,--a unanimous people, and not a single Spanish
bottom on the coast or Spanish soldier on the territory.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account