Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 19 (of 20)Sumner, Charles
History
Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 19 (of 20)
Sumner, Charles
Slavery -- United States; Speeches, addresses, etc., American
Sir, on that issue I invoke the sentiments of mankind and posterity
when all of us have passed away. I know that it will be then written,
that the National Constitution is the Charter of a mighty Republic
dedicated to Human Rights, dedicated at its very birth by the Great
Declaration, and that whoever fails to enlarge and ennoble it by the
interpretation through which Human Rights are most advanced will fail
in his oath to support the Constitution: ay, Sir, fail in his oath!
The debate was continued successive days: Mr. Thurman of Ohio,
Mr. Ferry of Connecticut, Mr. Corbett and Mr. Kelly, both of
Oregon, Mr. Hill of Georgia, Mr. Stevenson of Kentucky, and
Mr. Tipton of Nebraska speaking against Mr. Sumner’s bill; Mr.
Harlan, of Iowa, in favor of it; and Mr. Frelinghuysen, of New
Jersey, declaring his support, if Mr. Sumner would modify its
provisions as to “churches.”
The substitute of Mr. Carpenter was rejected,--Yeas 17, Nays
34. A motion of Mr. Frelinghuysen to make the bill inapplicable
to “churches” was carried,--Yeas 29, Nays 24. The next
question was on a motion of Mr. Carpenter to strike out the
clause relating to “juries.” This was earnestly debated by Mr.
Edmunds, of Vermont. Before the vote was taken, Mr. Sumner
remarked:--
There is a famous saying that comes to us from the last century,
that the whole object of government in England--of King, Lords, and
Commons--is to bring twelve men into a jury-box. Sir, that is the whole
object of government, not only in England, but in every other country
where law is administered through popular institutions; and especially
is it the object of government here in the United States; and the
clause in this bill which it is now proposed to strike out is simply to
maintain that great principle of popular institutions.
This amendment was rejected,--Yeas 12, Nays 42. Other
amendments were moved and rejected.
* * * * *
The question was then taken on Mr. Sumner’s bill as an
amendment to the Amnesty Bill, and it was adopted by the
casting vote of Vice-President Colfax,--the Senate being
equally divided, Yeas 28, Nays 28, as follows:--
YEAS,--Messrs. Ames, Anthony, Brownlow, Cameron, Chandler,
Clayton, Conkling, Cragin, Fenton, Ferry of Michigan,
Frelinghuysen, Gilbert, Hamlin, Harlan, Morrill of Vermont,
Morton, Osborn, Patterson, Pomeroy, Ramsey, Rice, Sherman,
Spencer, Sumner, West, Wilson, Windom, and Wright,--28.
NAYS,--Messrs. Blair, Boreman, Carpenter, Cole, Corbett, Davis
of West Virginia, Ferry of Connecticut, Goldthwaite, Hamilton
of Texas, Hill, Hitchcock, Johnston, Kelly, Logan, Morrill of
Maine, Norwood, Pool, Robertson, Saulsbury, Sawyer, Schurz,
Scott, Stevenson, Stockton, Thurman, Tipton, Trumbull, and
Vickers,--28.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account