Porcelain -- Collectors and collecting; Porcelain, English; Pottery -- Collectors and collecting; Pottery, English -- History
Vase, large, by Bloor, painted with a
view of Temple Bar and a group of
flowers, in two large panels, on dark
blue and gold ground, 21 in. high.
Christie, December 5, 1902 21 0 0
Dessert service, painted with bouquets
of flowers on white ground, and
the borders gilt with vases and arabesques,
consisting of an ice-pail,
cover and liner, centre-dish on foot,
eight dishes and six plates. Christie,
July 5, 1920 17 17 0
Set of three vases, painted with flowers
in the Chinese taste in dark blue
panels, gilt snake handles, 6-3/4 in. to
8-1/4 in. high. Puttick & Simpson,
July 16, 1920 8 18 6
Set of four vases of flowers, on scroll
bases, with gilt paw feet, 6-3/4 in. high.
Puttick & Simpson, July 16, 1920 12 12 0
II
CHELSEA
CHINA
[Illustration: CHELSEA FIGURE.
With candelabrum.]
[Illustration: CHELSEA FIGURE OF CARPENTER WITH BAG OF TOOLS.
_In Victoria and Albert Museum._]
II
CHELSEA CHINA
The origin of Chelsea china is like that of the celebrated Charles
James Harrington Fitzroy Yellowplush, “wropped in mystry.” The
southwestern corner of London has always been connected with the making
of pottery in some form or another. To-day Messrs. Doulton carry on
the tradition of Lambeth and Vauxhall. Battersea was famed for its
enamelled ware, and Fulham had a factory established by John Dwight,
M.A., of Christ Church, Oxford, the inventor of porcelain in England,
to whom a patent was granted in 1671 for his manufacture of porcelain
and stone ware.
Tradition, with a light heart, circulated the fable that the origin of
the Chelsea works was owing to the clay that was brought as ballast in
ships from Chinese ports. In a “Life of Nollekens” this absurdity finds
its way into print, but for all that it is utterly without foundation.
“The cunning rogues produced very white and delicate ware, but then
they had their clay from China, which, when the Chinese found out,
they would not let the captains have any more for ballast, and the
consequence was that the whole concern failed.”
Equally foolish and erroneous statements have been made about other of
the English factories, and the difficulty of sifting real facts from a
mass of chaff in such factories as Bow or Lowestoft is very great.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account