-----------+--------+----------------------------
| | Percentage Positive to
Species | Number +-------+---------+----------
| Tested | 1 Per | 0.1 Per | 0.01 Per
| | Cent | Cent | Cent
-----------+--------+-------+---------+----------
Horse | 1 | 100 | 100 | 100
Dog | 91 | 83 | 35 | 0
Goat | 11 | 55 | 36 | 0
Rat | 10 | 30 | 20 | 0
Mouse | 7 | 70 | 14 | 0
Rabbit | 2 | 100 | 0 | 0
Guinea-pig | 12 | 33 | 0 | 0
Monkey | 9 | 22 | 0 | 0
-----------+--------+-------+---------+----------
The horse appears to be the most sensitive and the monkey and
guinea-pig the most resistant species, while the dog would seem to have
a sensitivity as near man as any of the species studied. No animal
has yet been found which will give a blister from the application of
mustard gas.
Smith, Clowes and Marshall[22] have studied the mechanism of absorption
by the skin. They find that it is quite evident that the mustard gas
is at first rapidly taken up by some element on, or adjacent to, the
surface of the skin and for two to three minutes it may be completely
removed, and for ten to fifteen minutes partially removed by prolonged
washing With an organic solvent, and to a lesser extent with soap and
water.
[Footnote 22: J. Pharmacol., =13=, 1 (1919).]
An interesting phenomenon is observed when the untreated normal skin
of one subject is impressed for five minutes upon an area of skin
of another subject, which has been exposed previously to the vapors
of mustard gas. Under these circumstances both donor and recipient
may develop burns (due to the transposition of the poison from one
skin to another), the intensity of which will vary according to the
circumstances and the respective sensitiveness of the participants. The
degree of transposition is most strikingly observed in the intensity
of the burn on the donor’s arm. If two similar exposures are made on
the arm of a sensitive man, and one of these burns is treated, so to
speak, by contact for five minutes, with the skin of a resistant man,
the treated burn will be markedly less severe than the control, in some
cases being entirely prevented. If, however, the recipient is equally
sensitive to or more sensitive than the donor, the burns on the latter
will exhibit far less difference. Both treatments may be effected at
once, using two recipients, one more, and the other less, resistant
than the donor. In such a case the burn brought into contact with the
more resistant skin will be the less severe.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account