The modern science of chemistry is relatively new. It gradually
emerged from alchemy, which practically constituted the chemistry
of the middle ages. The objects of alchemy were various: (1) the
transmutation of the base metals into gold, by means of the so-called
“Philosopher’s Stone”; (2) The fixation of Mercury; (3) The discovery
of the elixir of Life, etc. These were the purely chemical aspects of
alchemy, but we now know that the alchemists had much more than this
in mind, in their experimental work, and that they hinted at their
true meaning in many of their veiled writings. Many of the higher
types of alchemists were also mystics, and when they wrote in chemical
symbols, they really concealed their inner meaning; they referred,
very largely, to the inner spirit of man, and the methods by which
this could be changed or transformed into some higher spiritual being.
(See “Alchemy Ancient and Modern,” by H. Stanley Redgrove; “Alchemy,
Its Scope and Romance,” by the Rev. J. E. Mercer, etc.) Mr. Foster
Damon has lately published a series of articles in which he has brought
forward a mass of evidence tending to prove that the alchemists were
also deep students of psychic phenomena, and that their experiments
relative to the “First Matter” were really experiments in so-called
“Materialization!” He has published his findings in a series of
articles in the “Occult Review.”
MODERN CHEMISTRY
Modern chemistry may be said to begin with Robert Boyle (1626–1691).
He defined an element as a substance which could not be decomposed,
but which could enter into combination with other elements, giving
compounds capable of decomposition into these original elements. The
number of elements which were thought to exist varied greatly,--some
contending that they were but few in number, others that they were
numerous. It must be remembered that all this was before the time
of Dalton, and that the atomic theory had not yet been advanced as
a scientific hypothesis, since the days of the ancient Greeks, when
Democritus and Epicurus had defended this view. The swing of science,
at that time was, therefore, toward the materialism of those older
writers, and the atomic theories which they had then proposed.
Chemistry is that branch of science which investigates the nature
and properties of matter in all its forms. It is, perhaps, the most
materialistic of all the sciences, since it deals essentially with
matter. Physics deals with forces or energies, or the energies
manifested by and through matter, but the two are more or less
inter-related--especially of late years, as we shall see. Chemistry is
essentially an _experimental_ science, and practically everything which
has been learned about it has been acquired by means of laboratory
experimentation. But here as elsewhere theories have woven together the
mass of separate facts, and of them made a consistent and philosophical
science.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account