The questioner called the Chief's attention to a newspaper and some advertisements it carried. In spite of the questioner's declaration that the paper was a Tammany organ, and that all Tammany men were supposed to buy it and read it, the Chief declared that he never had done so. The questioner made the Chief a present of a copy of the paper, and asked him to read over the massage advertisements. The Chief thanked him and said, "I will attend to these places because I do not believe in such disguises for disorderly houses. Such places are usually in tenement houses and flats. I will attend to them and drive them out." "Will you make the same pledge about pool rooms," demanded the questioner quickly? "That I cannot promise," replied the Chief. "Why can't you promise it?" asked the questioner. "Because they conduct that sort of business in places where we can't get at them, and you know it, but I will try and stamp it out." Chicago and New York methods quite agree, with the advantage in favor of New York. In the latter city, the Chief of Police "will try" to stamp pool rooms out. In Chicago, the Chief, in his reply to similar questions, said: "While a man may come to my office and give information that a certain individual is violating the law somewhere and it is a trivial offense, I do not pay so much attention to it as I do when a report reaches my office that a man has committed a serious crime, such as murder, that a serious crime has been committed on the outside. I should naturally abandon that part of it, and take up the more serious offense, and I have been looking up serious crimes, such as burglary, robbery and the hold-up people, and I have made a desperate effort to suppress that." It was in this connection reference was made by the committee to the fact that one of Chicago's policemen had shortly before been arrested for holding up a citizen and robbing him in the daylight hours, which called forth the reply already quoted in these pages to the effect that this particular star had been tried, that he was a member of the police force for ten years, was a good officer, but got drunk and became a "little indiscreet." For this he was dismissed from the force, but reinstated because "many people" vouched for him. It seems almost incredible that that man is today a member of Chicago's police force; yet such is the shameful fact.