Childhood in literature and art, with some observations on literature for children : $b A studyScudder, Horace Elisha
History
Childhood in literature and art, with some observations on literature for children : $b A study
Scudder, Horace Elisha
Children in art; Children in literature
The child, in the Homeric conception, was a little human creature
uninvested with any mystery, a part of that society which had itself
scarcely passed beyond the bounds of childhood. As the horizon which
limited early Greece was a narrow one, and the world in which the heroes
moved was surrounded by a vast _terra incognita_, so human life, in
its Homeric acceptance, was one of simple forms; that which lay beyond
tangible and visible experience was rarely visited, and was peopled with
shapes which brought a childish fright. There was, in a word, nothing in
the development of man’s nature, as recorded by Homer, which would make
him look with questioning toward his child. He regarded the world about
him with scarcely more mature thought than did the infant whom he tossed
in the air, and, until life should be apprehended in its more complex
relations, he was not likely to see in his child anything more than an
epitome of his own little round. The contrast between childhood and
manhood was too faint to serve much of a purpose in art.
The difference between Homer and the tragedians is at once perceived
to be the difference between a boy’s thought and a man’s thought. The
colonial growth, the Persian war, the political development, the commerce
with other peoples, were witnesses to a more complex life and the quick
causes of a profounder apprehension of human existence. It happens that
we have in the Œdipus Tyrannus of Sophocles an incident which offers a
suggestive comparison with the simple picture of the parting of Hector
and Andromache. In the earlier poem, the hero, expecting the fortunes
of war, disdains all suggestions of prudence, and speaks as a brave man
must, who sets honor above ease, and counts the cost of sacrifice only
to stir himself to greater courage and resolution. He asks that his
child may take his place in time, and he dries his wife’s tears with the
simple words that no man can separate him from her, that fate alone can
intervene; in Chapman’s nervous rendering:—
“Afflict me not, dear wife,
With these vain griefs. He doth not live that can disjoin my life
And this firm bosom but my fate; and fate, whose wings can fly?
Noble, ignoble, fate controls. Once born, the best must die.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account