Children -- Books and reading; Children's literature -- Bibliography; Children's literature -- History and criticism
The set notions that fill the pages of “Practical Education” often
border on the verge of bathos. They leave no room for the exercise of
spontaneous inclination; by their limitations, they recognise no great
amount of common sense in others. They create in one a desire at times
to laugh, and again a desire to shake the authors who were in the frame
of mind to hold such views. There are certain instincts which are
active by reason of their own natures,--and one is the love of parent
for offspring. We even accredit the wild animal with this quality. When
the Edgeworths declare that “My dear, have you nothing to do?” should
be spoken in sorrow, rather than in anger, the advice irritates; it is
platitudinous; it must have irritated many naturally good mothers, even
in those days when such a tone in writers was more the rule than the
exception.
On the subject of books Miss Edgeworth and her father become more
interesting, though none the less startling in their suggestions.
One of Maria’s early tasks in 1782 had been to translate “Adèle et
Théodore”; to her this book was worthy of every consideration. In the
choice of reading for young folks, the two do not reach very much
beyond their own contemporaries: Mrs. Barbauld’s “Lessons,” the Aikin’s
“Evenings at Home,” Berquin’s “L’Ami des Enfans,” Day’s “Sandford and
Merton” were recommended. And in addition there were mentioned Madame
de Silleri’s stories, known as the “Theatre of Education,” Madame de
la Fite’s “Tales” and “Conversations,” and Mrs. Smith’s “Rural Walks.”
Despite the fact that fairy tales are at this period frowned upon as
useless frivolities, “Robinson Crusoe,” “Gulliver’s Travels,” “The
Three Russian Sailors,” and the “Arabian Nights’ Entertainment” are
suggested because of the interest and profit to be had in voyages and
travels of all kinds. Fancy was thus held at a discount.
Two books of nature are mentioned, and curiously one is emphasised as
of special value for children provided it is beforehand judiciously
cut or blotted out here and there. The Edgeworths obtained this idea
from an over-careful mother who was in the habit of acting as censor
and editor of all juvenile books that found their way into her house.
In Russia, the authorities take an ink pad and stamp out the condemned
passages of any book officially examined. In the same summary manner,
English parents were advised to treat their children’s stories. The
Edgeworths went even further, suggesting that, besides striking out
separate words with a pen, it would be well to cut the undesirable
paragraphs from the page, provided by so doing the sense of the text on
the reverse side was not materially interfered with. To mark the best
thoughts for young readers was also strongly recommended.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account