Children -- Books and reading; Children's literature -- Bibliography; Children's literature -- History and criticism
What is true of these young people is therefore likewise true of their
grown-up associates. They have definite personalities, and they are
either monstrosities of excellence or demons of vice and temper. But
here also a careful distinction was preserved. Mr. Lucas says in his
“Old-Fashioned Tales”:
“The parents who can do no wrong are very numerous; but they are, it
should be pointed out, usually the parents of the central child. There
are very often parents and relations of other and subsidiary children
whose undesirable habits are exceedingly valuable by way of contrast.”
Despite the fact that there is so much to condemn in this _genre_
of writing, Miss Edgeworth was endowed with that sober sense and
inexhaustible power of invention claimed for her by critics of the
period. Her care for detail, her exhibition of small actions that
mark the manners of all people in different walks of life, were
distinguishing features of her skill.
With her father Miss Edgeworth laboured on other things besides the
“Practical Education”; while the two were preparing the essay on “Irish
Bulls,” published in 1802, she plainly states that the first design was
due to him, and that in her own share she was sedulously following
the ideas suggested by him. Throughout her autobiographical data she
offers us many glimpses of that family unity which existed--whether
from voluntary desire or because of the domineering grip of Edgeworth,
is not stated. She was continuously solicitous for his welfare, not
through any forced sense of duty, but because of her desire to give
pleasure in small ways; she found it agreeable to sit of an evening
doing needle work, while Edgeworth “read out” Pope’s Homer. In the
course of such hours she first became acquainted with Scott’s “Lady of
the Lake” and “Waverley.”
The friendship between Miss Edgeworth and Scott was deep and cordial;
one was not without abiding influence on the other. She describes
with graphic pen the first sound of his voice at Abbotsford; and
the biographer has no more agreeable material to work upon than her
fortnight spent as a guest of the novelist, and his return visit to
Edgeworthtown in 1825.
For a man whose avowed detestation of women was well known to every
one, Thomas Day (1748–1789) succeeded in leading a life of romantic
variety. Yet he was not a person of strong passion; in fact, was more
inclined to brooding melancholy. His intimacy with the Edgeworth family
began when he met Richard Lovell at Oxford; and it was when he saw
the training of Émile applied to his friend’s son that his mind was
seized with the idea of carrying out a similar scheme himself. He held
a great contempt for dress; and his numerous vagaries regarding the
conduct and duties of a wife were so pronounced that it is most likely
they came between himself and Maria Edgeworth, with whom it is thought
there was some romantic understanding.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account