Porcelain -- Collectors and collecting -- United States; Pottery -- Collectors and collecting -- United States
The frail fluted bowl, the graceful pitcher with twisted handle, and the
fragile creamer of queen’s ware shown on page 1 are all Wedgwood of
lovely shape and so thin and delicate a paste, that it is wonderful that
they have been safely preserved for a hundred years outside a
collector’s cabinet, and stranger still, have been used upon the
tea-table of a country home.
[Illustration: Castleford Teapot.]
A pottery was founded at Castleford in 1770, and black basalt ware, much
like Wedgwood’s, was made, and white stone-ware which must have been
imported to this country in vast quantity, for specimens are not rare. A
teapot commonly seen is here shown. It is found both in black basalt, a
curious brown ware, and salt-glazed cream ware. Special raised work
designs of the figure of Liberty and the American eagle were used, and
the sugar-bowls, creamers, and teapots bearing such designs were
doubtless made entirely for this market. The white surface of Castleford
ware was frequently divided into compartments by raised lines which were
colored blue or green. Teapots were made with lids hinged on metal pins,
or with sliding lids, and were exceedingly pretty and convenient. They
are often called Wedgwood, as are also pieces of Castleford black ware.
VI.
ENGLISH PORCELAINS IN AMERICA
As soon as porcelain was manufactured to any extent in England it was
exported to America. The _Boston Evening Post_ of November, 1754,
advertised “a variety of Bow China Cups and Saucers and Bowls,” and
other sales of Bow china were made, and special pieces also brought
across the ocean to wealthy Americans. Specimens of Plymouth and Bow
china may still be occasionally found in America, but any such that have
been preserved and gathered into private collections can be positively
identified only by comparison with authenticated and marked pieces in
public collections. It would be impossible to give any definite Bow
marks. The stamp or design of the anchor and dagger is popularly
considered proof that the piece thus marked is Bow. The triangle,
formerly regarded as a positive Bow mark, now appears to have a rather
shaky reputation, and is as frequently assigned to Chelsea. The
character and shape of the ware, and the style of the decoration are
better grounds to base identification upon than any marks. Excavations
made upon the site of the old Bow china-works revealed much débris of
broken pieces of china, and these specimens afford the most positive
means of identifying the paste and ornamentation. An account of these
discoveries was given in the _Art Journal_ of 1869. All the fragments
found were of porcelain, milky-white in color, and relatively heavy for
the thickness; some were ornamented in relief, with the May flower or
hawthorn; with a little sprig of two roses and a leaf on a stalk; with
the basket pattern; or with vertical bands overlaid with scrolls. Some
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account