Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 1. Pottery and early waresHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 1. Pottery and early wares
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
[Footnote 198: The _Memoir of Chiang_ (see p. 159), written in the Yüan
dynasty, says that the "pure white ware of Ching-tê Chên in the Sung
dynasty, when compared with the red porcelain (_hung tz´ŭ_) of Chên-ting
and the Lung-ch´üan green ware, emulated these in beauty." Chên-ting
is the Chên-ting Fu, the prefectural town of Ting Chou, and the ware
indicated is no doubt Ting ware; but here the comparison clearly seems to
be between white wares, and unless the word _hung_ (red) applies to some
variety of the Ting biscuit as distinct from the glaze, it is difficult to
understand.]
[Footnote 199: [Chinese] _tzŭ_, "purple or dark red brown," is, like
most Chinese colour-words, a somewhat elastic term. The dictionary gives
instances in which it is applied to "red sandal wood," "brown sugar," the
ruby, the violet, and the peony.]
[Footnote 200: Op. cit., fig. 35.]
[Footnote 201: See p. 131. I have seen a single specimen of a bowl with
carved design and creamy white glaze inside and all the appearances of
a Ting ware, but coated on the exterior with a lustrous coffee brown
monochrome. But without any other example to guide one's judgment, I
should hesitate to say that this piece was older than the Ming dynasty.]
[Footnote 202: Hsü Tz´ŭ-shu, author of the _Ch´a Su_, a book on tea,
quoted in the _T´ao shuo_, bk. v., fol. 15 verso.]
[Footnote 203: The potteries in the Chên-ting Fu district were active up
to the end of the Ming dynasty, at any rate (see p. 199); and no doubt
many of the coarse _t´u ting_ specimens belong to the Ming period, but as
their forms are archaic it is almost impossible nowadays to differentiate
them.]
[Footnote 204: Julien, op. cit., p. 21, places this town in Kiang-nan, but
this is clearly an error.]
[Footnote 205: In contrast with these there were specimens with "green
mouth," _ch´ing k´ou_ which were "wanting in richness and lustre."]
[Footnote 206: The date of Chou Tan-ch´üan is not given, but he is
mentioned in the _Ni ku lu_, a mid-sixteenth-century work.]
[Footnote 207: A well-known type of bronze incense burner of the Shang
dynasty. See the _Shin sho sei_, bk. i., fol. 2; and Hsiang's Album, fig.
1, where a Ting ware copy is illustrated.]
[Footnote 208: Julien, op. cit., pp. xxxiii.-xxxv.; the reference in the
_T´ao lu_ is bk. viii., fol. 5.]
[Footnote 209: Perhaps the celebrated "white Ting censer" described on p.
92.]
[Footnote 210: Bk. ii., fol. 9 verso.]
[Footnote 211: The _Liu ch´ing jih cha_, written by T´ien Yi-hêng in the
Ming dynasty.]
[Footnote 212: [Chinese] _T´ao lu_, vol. vii., fol. 9 verso. See also
bk. ix., fol. 9, where the _Ch´ing po tsa chih_ (1193 A.D.) is quoted as
follows: "The wares used at the present day, which are made at So Chou and
Ssŭ Chou, are not genuine Ting ware."]
[Footnote 213: [Chinese] _T´ao lu_, vol. vii., fol. 9 verso.]
[Footnote 214: [Chinese] _T´ao lu_, vol. vii., fol. 10 verso.]
[Footnote 215: F. Brinkley, _Japan and China_, vol. ix., p. 259.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account