Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 1. Pottery and early waresHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 1. Pottery and early wares
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
[Footnote 252: Bk. ii., fol. 7 verso. In discussing the glazes with mixed
colour, the author says: "Of these wares, the sword-grass bowls and their
saucers alone are refined. The other kinds, like the garden seats, boxes,
square vases, and flower jars, are all of yellow sandy earthenware.
Consequently, they are coarse and thick, and not refined." The first
sentence is difficult, and has given rise to much discussion. The word
_ti_, which Bushell has (rightly, I think) rendered saucers, literally
means "bottom" or "base." Hirth reads it, "Those which have bottoms like
the flower pots in which sword-grass is grown are considered the most
excellent"; and Julien appears to have quite misunderstood the application
of the passage. The original is [Chinese]. The shallow saucers in which
the deep flower pots stood are often included among the bulb bowls. See
Plates 37 and 40.]
[Footnote 253: See the excellent account of the Chün wares by Mrs.
Williams in the introduction to the _Catalogue of a Loan Exhibition of
Chinese, Corean, and Japanese Potteries held by the Japan Society of New
York, 1914_.]
[Footnote 254: Shrivelled glaze is sometimes seen on the Chün types of
pottery. Probably this was at first, at any rate, an accidental effect;
but it is the prototype of the "dragon skin" glazes which the Japanese
made at a later date. There is a good example in the Eumorfopoulos
Collection of a bowl with thick grey Chün glaze, with a patch of reddish
colour, and which is shrivelled in the most approved fashion, the glaze
contracting into isolated drops and exposing the body between them.]
[Footnote 255: See _T´ao shuo_, bk. ii., fol. 15 verso, quoting the _Liu
ch´ing jih cha_. In the case of the former (_t´u ssŭ wên_) some confusion
has been caused by a variant reading [Chinese] of the word [Chinese]
(_t´u_ = hare), which refers the simile to the "dodder"; but the commoner
phrase, "hare's fur marking," is far more descriptive of a dappled
surface. Brinkley's explanation of the second phrase, _huo yen ch´ing_,
as referring to the blue centre of a tongue of flame, applying the simile
to the passages of blue which sometimes occur in the variegated Chün
glazes, seems to meet the case. The flame-like effects are mentioned in an
interesting passage in the _T´ang chien kung t´ao yeh t´u shuo_ (quoted in
the _T´ao lu_, bk. viii., fol. 13): "Men prize the Chün cups, tripods, and
incense burners with smoke and flame glaze (_yen huan sê_). Although only
pottery, still they combine the unexpected colours produced by the blowing
tube (_t´o yo_)." The _t´o yo_ [Chinese] seems to have been "a pipe for
blowing up the furnace."]
[Footnote 256: See Hamilton Bell, "'Imperial' Sung Pottery," _Art in
America_, July, 1913, p. 182. The Chinese numerals are given on p. 211.]
[Footnote 257: _Cat. B.F.A._, 1910, B 42.]
[Footnote 258: There is an obvious analogy in the "_size 3_" and "_S 2_,"
etc., incised under the Derby porcelain figures.]
[Footnote 259: See p. 50.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account