Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 1. Pottery and early wares — John Shaqi
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 1. Pottery and early waresHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 1. Pottery and early wares
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
The most striking additions to our knowledge in recent years, have without
doubt been those which concern the T´ang pottery. What was previously a
blank is now filled with a rich series covering the whole gamut of ceramic
wares, from a soft plaster-like material through faïence and stoneware
up to true porcelain. The T´ang potters had little to learn in technical
matters. They used the soft lead glazes, coloured green, blue, amber, and
purplish brown by the same metallic oxides as formed the basis of the
cognate glazes on Ming pottery. They used high-fired feldspathic glazes,
white, brownish green, chocolate brown, purplish black, and tea-dust
green, sometimes with frothy splashes of grey or bluish grey, as on the
Sung wares. Sometimes these glazes were superposed as on the Japanese
tea jars, which avowedly owed their technique to Chinese models. It is
evident that streaked and mottled effects appealed specially to the taste
of the time, and marbling both of the glaze and of the body was practised.
Carving designs in low relief, or incising them with a pointed instrument
and filling in the spaces with coloured glazes, stamping small patterns
on the body, and applying reliefs which had been previously pressed out
in moulds, were methods employed for surface decoration. Painted designs
in unfired pigments appear on some of the tomb wares, and it is now
practically certain that painting in black under a green glaze was used
by the T´ang potters. Moreover, the existence of porcelain proper in the
T´ang period is definitely established.
One of the most remarkable features of T´ang pottery is the strong
Hellenistic flavour apparent in the shapes of the vessels and in
certain details of the ornament, particularly in the former. Other
foreign influences observable in T´ang art are Persian, Sassanian,
Scytho-Siberian, and Indian, and one would say that Chinese art at
this period was in a peculiarly receptive state. As compared with
the conventional style of later ages which we have come to regard as
characteristically Chinese, the T´ang art is quite distinctive, and almost
foreign in many of its aspects.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account