Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 1. Pottery and early waresHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 1. Pottery and early wares
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
There is no limit to the variety of articles made by the Yi-hsing
potters, but they chiefly excelled in small and dainty articles for the
writing-table, the toilet, and the tea-table, and personal ornaments.
Their tea wares have always been highly prized in Japan, where they have
been cleverly copied in Banko ware and by the Kioto potters. Similarly,
when tea-drinking became an institution in Europe in the last half of
the seventeenth century, and the East India companies set themselves to
supply the necessary apparatus from China, the Yi-hsing red teapots became
fashionable, and were immediately imitated by enterprising potters. The
Dutch and English seem to have been the first to succeed in this new
departure, and we read that Ary de Milde and W. van Eenhorn, of Delft,
applied for a monopoly of the manufacture in Holland in 1679, while
John Dwight, of Fulham, included the "Opacous, redd and Dark coloured
Porcellane or China" in the patent taken out in London five years
later. The brothers Elers, of Dutch extraction, started the industry
in Staffordshire about 1693, and made red stoneware teapots scarcely
distinguishable from the Chinese, and which sold for a guinea a piece.
The Yi-hsing wares in the celebrated Chinese ceramic collection formed by
Augustus the Strong at Dresden supplied designs for the fine red stoneware
made in the first years of the eighteenth century by Böttger, who also
discovered the secret of true porcelain in Europe and founded the famous
Meissen porcelain factory.
From the earliest days of their importation the Yi-hsing wares have
been known in Europe, especially in Italy, Spain, and Portugal, by the
Portuguese name of _buccaro_. The true _buccaro_ is a scented pottery,
first imported from Central and South America, where it was made by the
Indian population and afterwards manufactured in Portugal and Spain;
and Count Lorenzo Magalotti, who wrote in 1695, protested against the
application of the name "to certain unglazed pieces of Oriental origin,"
asserting that "true Buccaro never came from China or Japan, and that they
must not be looked for out of the pottery sent over from Central America
or the Portuguese imitations."[404] But the protests of purists were
unavailing, and _buccaro_ seems to have become a regular term for unglazed
pottery, even the archaic black ware from the Etruscan tombs receiving the
name of _buchero nero_.
[Illustration: PLATE 51
Two Vases with glaze imitating that of the Chün Chou wares: in the
Eumorfopoulos Collection.
Fig. 1.--Vase of Fat-shan (Kuangtung) Chün ware. Late Ming.
Height 9¾ inches.
Fig. 2.--Bottle-shaped Vase, the base suggesting a lotus flower and the
mouth a lotus seed-pod, with a ring of movable seeds on the rim. Thick
and almost crystalline glaze of lavender blue colour with a patch of
crimson. Yi-hsing Chün ware of the seventeenth century. Height 9¾
inches.
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account