Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 1. Pottery and early waresHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 1. Pottery and early wares
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
Another important group of Yi-hsing wares presents an entirely different
aspect, and indeed it is little understood in Europe, though it is
probably bought by unwary collectors for the Sung types which it purports
to imitate. This is the Yi-hsing Chün, to which allusion has already
been made in discussing the imitation Chün wares. The traditions of this
manufacture go back to the Ming dynasty, when a potter named Ou [Chinese]
gained a great reputation for his glazes, which "copied the Ko ware in
crackle and the Kuan and Chün wares in colour."[405] This is, no doubt,
the manufacture mentioned in the _Po wu yao lan_ in the passage dealing
with Chün yao: "At the present time (i.e. 1621-1627), among the recent
manufactures this kind of ware is all made with the sandy clay (_sha t´u_)
of Yi-hsing as body; the glaze is rather like the original, and in some
cases beautiful, but it does not wear well."
Though the original glazed wares of Ou are probably rarer to-day than
their Chün Chou prototypes, there is no reason to suppose that Ou´s
successors have not kept up the continuity of the manufacture. It is
certainly very much alive to-day, and an early eighteenth century
reference to "the applied glaze of Yi-hsing"[406] seems to imply its
existence at that time. I have before me as I write a tripod incense
burner of archaic form, the body a light buff stoneware and the glaze a
deep lavender, breaking into blue. It is a thick and rather opaque glaze,
sufficiently flowing to have left the upper edges almost bare and formed
thickly on the flatter and lower levels; the colour is broken by streaks
and clouding, which mark the downward flow of the glaze; the surface has
a barely perceptible crackle, which will no doubt become more marked with
age, and a subdued lustre between the brilliancy of the old opalescent
Chün types and the viscous, silken sheen of the Canton glazes[407] which
also imitate them. The colour and glaze are distinctly attractive, and
have much in common with the old Chün glazes, and though this is a frankly
modern piece, it shows the potentialities of the ware. Similar specimens
made, say, a hundred or two hundred years ago, and proportionately aged by
time and usage, might well cause trouble to the collector.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account