Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 1. Pottery and early waresHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 1. Pottery and early wares
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
[Illustration: [Chinese] Same in seal characters.]
[Illustration: [Chinese] CHIA CH´ING, 1796-1820.]
[Illustration: [Chinese] Same in seal characters.]
[Illustration: [Chinese] TAO KUANG, 1821-1850.]
[Illustration: [Chinese] Same in seal characters.]
[Illustration: [Chinese] HSIEN FÊNG, 1851-1861.]
[Illustration: [Chinese] Same in seal characters.]
[Illustration: [Chinese] T´UNG CHIH, 1862-1874.]
[Illustration: [Chinese] Same in seal characters.]
[Illustration: [Chinese] KUANG HSÜ, 1875-1909.]
[Illustration: [Chinese] Same in seal characters.]
(2) _Hall marks._
The "hall mark," which is of frequent occurrence on both porcelain and
pottery, is so called because it includes the word _t´ang_ [Chinese]
(hall) or some equivalent such as _chai_ [Chinese] (a study), _t´ing_
[Chinese] (a pavilion), _hsien_ or _hsüan_ [Chinese] (a porch, balcony or
pavilion), _kuan_ [Chinese] (a residence or hostelry), _fang_ [Chinese]
(a room or house), _chü_ [Chinese] (a dwelling). The word _t´ang_ as
explained in Giles's Dictionary is "a hall: especially a hall of justice
or court; the ancestral hall; an official title." _T´ang ming_ is "the
family hall name--a fancy name usually consisting of two characters
followed by _t´ang_ (e.g. _wu tê t´ang chin_ = Chin of the military valour
hall), and referring to some event in family history. It is generally
inscribed in one of the principal rooms of the house, and is used in
deeds, on graves, boundary stones, etc."
The hall mark, then, may contain the studio name of the maker or of the
recipient of the ware, or it may have reference literally to the building
for which the ware was intended. The last interpretation can be generally
applied to the marks referring to halls or pavilions in the precincts
of the Imperial palace. Again, the hall may be the shop of a dealer
who ordered the goods. But in the absence of prepositions, it is not
always--not often, I should perhaps say--possible to determine which of
these alternatives is implied in any particular hallmark; e.g. [Chinese]
_Lin yü t´ang chih_ may mean "made in the Abundant-Jade Hall," or "for"
the same, or by a man whose studio name was _Lin-yü t´ang_.
As to the antiquity of hall marks, it was not considered anachronistic
to cut one on a Han granary urn which is now in the British Museum; but
unfortunately as the cutting was done after the ware was baked it is now
impossible to say at what period it was executed. A Sung example is quoted
in the _Ni ku lu_ (written in the middle of the sixteenth century) as
inscribed on a Ting Chou vase in the handwriting of the Mi family, viz.,
_jên ho kuan_ [Chinese] (Hotel of Benevolence and Harmony). A similar mark
similarly placed is [Chinese] _jên ts´un t´ang_ (Hall of Benevolence), on
a Tz´ŭ Chou jar in the Eumorfopoulos Collection.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account