Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 1. Pottery and early waresHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 1. Pottery and early wares
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
The practice of burying with the dead the objects which surrounded him in
life has never entirely ceased in any country. Among primitive peoples it
has taken the revolting form of immolating, or even burying alive, the
household of a dead chieftain. Instances of this practice in China occur
as late as the third century b.c., and voluntary acts of sacrifice at the
tomb are recorded much later in China as in India. When humaner counsels
prevailed figures of wood, straw and clay were substituted, straw images
being suggested for the purpose by Confucius himself. In the Han dynasty
the tomb of the well-to-do was furnished with models of his house, his
shrine, his farmyard, threshing floor, rice-pounder, his cattle, sheep,
dogs, and poultry, besides his retainers and certain half-human creatures
which may have been his guardian spirits; it was provided with vases
for wine and grain, models of the stove and kitchen range with cooking
pots and implements--the last merely indicated in low relief on the
kitchen range--besides the more stately sacrificial vessels for wine and
incense.[24] All these were modelled in pottery, and must have fostered a
flourishing potter's trade, and given a tremendous impetus to the growth
of modelling and design. The underlying idea of all this was, no doubt, to
provide the spirit of the dead with the means of pursuing the habits of
his lifetime, and the modern practice of supplying his needs by means of
paper models which are transmitted to the spirit world through the medium
of fire serves the same purpose in a more economical fashion. But a fuller
note on the grave furniture of the Han and T´ang periods will be given in
the next chapter.
Little or nothing is at present known of the potteries in which the Han
wares were made, but we may fairly assume that the manufacture was very
general and that local potteries supplied local demands. An incidental
reference in the _T´ao lu_ gives us one solitary name, Nan Shan, where the
potteries of the Emperor Wu Ti (140-85 B.C.) were situated;[25] and there
is a mention of potteries in Kiangsi in the place which was afterwards the
site of the celebrated porcelain centre, Ching-tê Chên.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account