Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 1. Pottery and early wares — John Shaqi
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 1. Pottery and early waresHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 1. Pottery and early wares
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
When humaner influences prevailed, the ladies of the harem, and the
military guards, instead of following their Imperial master to the spirit
world, were condemned to reside within the precincts of the mausoleum; and
doubtless the clay figures of women and warriors placed in the graves of
more enlightened times were intended to relieve their human prototypes of
this irksome duty. The earliest recorded allusion[33] to clay substitutes
appears to be the words of Kuang Wu (in the first century A.D.), that
"anciently, at every burial of an emperor or king, human images of
stoneware (_t´ao jên_), implements of earthenware (_wa ch´i_), wooden
cars, and straw horses were used."
De Groot[34] quotes a long list of objects supplied for an Imperial burial
of the Later Han (25-220 A.D.), including "eight hampers of various
grains and pease; three earthen pots of three pints, holding respectively
pickled meat, preserved meat, and sliced food; two earthen liquor jars
of three pints, filled with must and spirits; ... one candlestick of
earthenware; ... eight goblets, tureens, pots, square baskets, wine jars;
one wash-basin with a ewer; bells, ... musical instruments, ... arms; nine
carriages, and thirty-six straw images of men and horses; two cooking
stoves, two kettles, one rice strainer, and twelve caldrons of five pints,
all of earthenware; ... ten rice dishes of earthenware, two wine pots of
earthenware holding five pints." The use of earthenware substitutes for
the actual belongings of the dead was due in part to the spirit of economy
preached by certain rulers at this time, and in part to the feeling that
graves containing valueless objects would be safe from the desecration of
the robber.
In addition to the general precepts of economy, we learn that definite
regulations were issued prescribing the number and even the nature of
the articles to be used by the various ranks of the nobility and by
the proletariat. Thus in 682 A.D. Kao Tsung rebuked the competitive
extravagance of the people in burial equipments, which even the ravages
of famine had failed to diminish; and in the K´ai Yüan period an Imperial
decree[35] of the year 741 A.D. reduced the number of implements allowed
to the various ranks in burial, officers of the first, second, and third
classes of nobility being allowed seventy, forty, and twenty implements
in place of ninety, seventy, and forty respectively; while for the common
people fifteen only were permitted. Moreover, all such implements were to
be of plain earthenware (_ssŭ wa_), wood, gold, silver, copper, and tin
being forbidden.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account