Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing PorcelainHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing Porcelain
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
The painting on the steatitic porcelain differs in style from that
of the ordinary blue and white of this period. It is executed with
delicate touches like miniature painting, and every stroke of the
brush tells, the effects being produced by fine lines rather than by
graded washes. The ware, being costly to make, is usually painted by
skilful artists and in the finest blue. Fig. 3, of Plate 93, is an
excellent example of the pure steatitic ware, an incense bowl in the
Franks collection, of which the base and a large part of the interior
is unglazed and affords a good opportunity for the study of the body
material. The glaze is thin and faintly crackled, and the design--Hsi
Wang Mu and the Taoist Immortals--is delicately drawn in light, clear
blue.
The second type, which has only a dressing of steatite over the
ordinary body, has neither the same lightness nor the opacity of the
true steatitic ware, but it has the same soft white surface, and is
painted in the same style of line drawing.
There are, besides, other opaque and crackled wares painted in
underglaze blue, which are also described as “soft paste,” and, indeed,
deserve the name far more than the steatitic porcelain. The creamy,
crackled copies of old Ting wares, for instance, made with _ch’ing
tien_ stone,[291] are occasionally enriched with blue designs; and
the ordinary stone-coloured crackle with buff staining is also painted
at times with underglaze blue,[292] or with blue designs on pads of
white clay in a crackled ground.
On the other hand, there are numerous wares of the Yung Chêng and
Ch’ien Lung periods which are probably composed in part, at least, of
steatite. They are usually opaque, and the surface is sometimes dead
white, sometimes creamy and often undulating like orange peel, and in
addition to blue decoration, enamel painting is not infrequent on these
later types. The purely steatitic porcelains are generally of small
size, which was appropriate to the style of painting as well as to the
expensive nature of the material. The furniture of the scholar’s table,
with its tiny flower vases for a single blossom, its brush washers and
water vessels of fanciful forms, its pigment boxes, etc., were suitable
objects for the material, and many of these little crackled porcelains
are veritable gems. Snuff bottles are another appropriate article, and
a representative collection of snuff bottles will show better than
anything the great variety of these mixed wares and so-called “soft
pastes.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account