Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing PorcelainHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing Porcelain
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
Something has already been said[288] of another very distinctive class
of blue and white for which the misleading name of “soft paste” has
been widely adopted. The term is of American origin and has been too
readily accepted, for it is not only inaccurate as a description,
but is already current in Europe for a totally different ware, which
it describes with greater exactitude, viz. the artificial, glassy
porcelains made at Sèvres and Chelsea and other factories, chiefly in
France and England, in the middle of the eighteenth century. In actual
fact the Chinese ware to which the term “soft paste” is applied has
an intensely hard body. The glaze, however, which is softer than that
of the ordinary porcelain, contains a proportion of lead, and if not
actually crackled from the first becomes so in use, the crackle lines
being usually irregular and undecided.
A detailed description of the manufacture of this ware is given by Père
d’Entrecolles,[289] though he is probably at fault in supposing that
its chief ingredient was a recent discovery in 1722. It was made, he
says, with a mineral called _hua shih_ (in place of kaolin), a stone of
glutinous and soapy nature, and almost certainly corresponding to the
steatite or “soapy rock” which was used by the old English porcelain
makers at Bristol, Worcester and Liverpool. “The porcelain made with
_hua shih_,” to quote Père d’Entrecolles, “is rare and far more
expensive than the other porcelain. It has an extremely fine grain; and
for purposes of painting, when compared with ordinary porcelain, it is
almost as vellum to paper. Moreover, this ware is surprisingly light
to anyone accustomed to handle the other kinds; it is also far more
fragile than the ordinary, and there is difficulty in finding the exact
temperature for its firing. Some of the potters do not use _hua shih_
for the body of the ware, but content themselves with making a diluted
slip into which they dip their porcelain when dry, so as to give it a
coating of soapstone before it is painted and glazed. By this means it
acquires a certain degree of beauty.” The preparation of the _hua shih_
is also described, but it is much the same as that of the kaolin, and
the composition of the steatitic body is given as eight parts of _hua
shih_ to two of porcelain stone (_petuntse_).
There are, then, two kinds of steatitic porcelain, one with the body
actually composed of _hua shih_ and the other with a mere surface
dressing of this material. The former is light to handle, and opaque;
and the body has a dry, earthy appearance, though it is of fine grain
and unctuous to touch. It is variously named by the Chinese[290]
_sha-t’ai_ (sand bodied) and _chiang-t’ai_ (paste bodied), and when the
glaze is crackled it is further described as _k’ai pien_ (crackled).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account